Diffusion-weighted imaging vs STIR turbo SE imaging: capability for quantitative differentiation of small-cell lung cancer from non-small-cell lung cancer

Objective:

To compare the capability of differentiation of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) from non-SCLC (NSCLC) between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) turbo spin-echo imaging.

Methods:

The institutional review board of Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan, approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. 49 patients with NSCLC (30 males and 19 females; mean age, 66.8 years) and 7 patients with SCLC (5 males and 2 females; mean age, 68.6 years) enrolled and underwent DWI and STIR. To quantitatively differentiate SCLC from NSCLC, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on DWI and contrast ratios (CRs) between cancer and muscle on STIR were evaluated. ADC values and CRs were then compared between the two cell types by Mann–Whitney''s U-tests, and the diagnostic performances were compared by McNemar''s test.

Results:

There were significant differences of mean ADC values (p < 0.001) and mean CRs (p = 0.003). With adopted threshold values, the specificity (85.7%) and accuracy (85.7%) of DWI were higher than those of STIR (specificity, 63.3%; p = 0.001 and accuracy, 66.1%; p = 0.001). In addition, the accuracy of combination of both indexes (94.6%; p = 0.04) could significantly improve as compared with DWI alone.

Conclusion:

DWI is more useful for the differentiation of SCLC from NSCLC than STIR, and their combination can significantly improve the accuracy in this setting.

Advances in knowledge:

Pulmonary MRI, including DWI and STIR, had a potential of the suggestion of the possibility as SCLC.Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death among both males and females worldwide.¹ Lung cancers are divided into non-small-cell cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and the differentiation between SCLC and NSCLC is important in clinical practice because their therapeutic strategies, clinical course and prognoses are different.² In general, SCLC is usually determined with extensive hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy,³ and these cancers are mainly treated by chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.^2,4On the other hand, 5–10% of patients with SCLC were diagnosed as having solitary pulmonary nodules.^5,6 In this situation, the assessments of distant metastases before treatment play an important role in deciding the treatment. At present, although there are some different reports for patients with NSCLC regarding the assessment of distant metastases before surgery,^7–9 it is important to assess the distant metastases of these patients with SCLC because SCLC is known for its rapid doubling time, high growth fraction and early development of metastatic disease.^10–12 If patients with SCLC are diagnosed at Stage I or possibly Stage II, clinicians consider their treatment as surgery and/or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.^13–15 Therefore, the differentiation between SCLC and NSCLC and the suggestion of the possibility of SCLC may be important in routine clinical practice. However, the differentiation of SCLC from NSCLC is difficult on CT and positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/CT,^5,6,16 and fiberoptic bronchoscopy and percutaneous biopsy are recommended, although their diagnostic sensitivities range from 67% to 100%.^17–19Recently, the image quality and diagnostic capability of chest MRI has improved because of the advancement of MR systems and sequences, and short tau inversion recovery (STIR) turbo spin-echo (SE) imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) have been reported as useful in differentiating malignant nodules and lymph nodes from benign ones in several articles.^20–25 Meanwhile, the utilities of chest MRI, including STIR and DWI, have been reported,²⁶ and, in addition, meta-analysis report for pulmonary nodules by means of DWI have been published.²⁷ However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been only reports of chest DWI regarding the differentiation between SCLC and NSCLC,²² but no major studies have reported a direct comparison of the use of DWI and STIR in chest MRI for the assessment of differentiation between SCLC and NSCLC. We hypothesized that both DWI and STIR were useful MR sequences for differentiation of SCLC from NSCLC and their combination might improve the differentiation capabilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performances of DWI and STIR for differentiating between SCLC and NSCLC.