首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


In Vivo Canine Model Comparison of Cardiovascular Effects of Antidepressants Milnacipran and Imipramine
Authors:Yoshitaka Mitsumori  Yuji Nakamura  Kiyotaka Hoshiai  Yukitoshi Nagayama  Satomi Adachi-Akahane  Schuichi Koizumi  Masahiko Matsumoto  Atsushi Sugiyama
Affiliation:(1) Department of Pharmacology, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan;(2) Department of Surgery II, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan;(3) Yamanashi Research Center of Clinical Pharmacology, Yamanashi 406-0023, Japan;(4) Sugi Institute of Biological Science, Yamanashi 408-0044, Japan;(5) Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, Tokyo 143-8540, Japan;
Abstract:Milnacipran is a specific serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, which has been widely used against major depressive episodes. In this study, cardiovascular effects of milnacipran were assessed in comparison with those of a typical tricyclic antidepressant imipramine using the halothane-anesthetized dogs. Milnacipran (n = 6) or imipramine (n = 6) was intravenously administrated in three escalating doses of 0.1, 1 and 10 mg/kg over 10 min with a pause of 20 min between the doses. Clinically relevant plasma concentrations were obtained after 0.1–1 mg/kg of milnacipran in this study, whereas therapeutic dose and plasma concentration of imipramine were reported to be similar to those of milnacipran. The low and middle doses of milnacipran hardly affected cardiohemodynamic or electrophysiological variables except that they slightly increased vascular tone and ventricular contraction, whereas same doses of imipramine delayed repolarization process without affecting the other variables. The high dose of both milnacipran and imipramine induced similar extent of negative chronotropic, inotropic and dromotropic effects together with vasoconstriction and repolarization delay. Thus, the effects of milnacipran may be more selective for cardiohemodynamics than for repolarization delay, whereas reverse will be true for imipramine, supporting lack of clinical report of patients with milnacipran-induced long QT syndrome unlike imipramine.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号