神经行为发育监测及早期干预对高危儿智能发育影响的研究 |
| |
引用本文: | 朱华,彭珉娟,杨涛毅,李桦,张彤,陈先辉,程建. 神经行为发育监测及早期干预对高危儿智能发育影响的研究[J]. 四川医学, 2013, 0(12): 1780-1783 |
| |
作者姓名: | 朱华 彭珉娟 杨涛毅 李桦 张彤 陈先辉 程建 |
| |
作者单位: | 成都市第三人民医院暨重庆医科大学附属成都第二临床学院儿科,四川成都610031 |
| |
基金项目: | 四川省卫生厅科研课题(编号:080038) |
| |
摘 要: | 目的 探讨神经行为发育监测及早期干预对高危儿智能发育的影响,提高高危儿的生存质量.方法 将46例高危儿随机分为干预组和对照组,同时选取20例正常对照组进行随访观察.对干预组的高危儿定期进行神经行为发育监测和早期干预.各组均在3月、6月和1岁时用Gesell婴幼儿发育量表进行发育商的测评.结果 ① 3月时高危干预组和高危对照组5个能区的发育商(developmental quotient,DQ)均低于正常对照组 (P<0.01);高危干预组和高危对照组比较,各能区的DQ无差异(P>0.05).② 6月时高危干预组各能区的DQ均高于高危对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01和P<0.05);高危干预组和正常对照组4个能区的DQ无差异(P>0.05).③ 1岁时高危干预组各能区的DQ均明显高于高危对照组,差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01);高危干预组与正常对照组比较,各能区的DQ无差异(P>0.05).结论 神经行为发育监测及早期干预可以促进高危儿的智能发育,到1岁时能赶上正常儿童,有效减少残障的发生.
|
关 键 词: | 神经行为发育 早期干预 高危儿 发育商 |
Reserch of the impact of neurobehavioral developmental monitoring and early intervention on development of high-risk neonates |
| |
Affiliation: | ZHU Hua,PENG Min-juan,YANG Tao-yi |
| |
Abstract: | Objective To investigate the impact of neurobehavioral developmental monitoring and early intervention on development of high-risk neonates, to improve the quality of life. Methods 46 High-risk neonates were randomly divided into the intervention group and the control group, and the age-matched 20 normal children were selected as normal control group. Regular neurobehavioral development monitoring and early intervention were performed in high-risk intervention group. Every group re- ceived the evaluation of developmental quotient (DQ) by Gesell infant development scale at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after birth, respectively. Results (~)At 3 month, the DQs in high-risk intervention group and high-risk control group were significant- ly lower than normal control group ( P 〈 0. 01 ). There were no significant differences in the DQs between the two groups of high-risk(P 〉 0. 05. ) (~)At 6 month, all the DQs of high-risk intervention group were significantly higher than high-risk control group ( P 〈 0.01 $31 P 〈 0. 05 ). There were no significant differences in the DQ of four ability regions to people between high-risk intervention group and normal control group ( P 〉 0. 05 ). (~)At 1 year, the DQs of high-risk intervention group were extremely higher than high-risk control group ( P 〈 0.01 ). There were no significant differences in the DQs between high-risk intervention group and normal control group ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion Neurobehavioral developmental monitoring and early intervention can promote the high-risk neonates' neurobehavioral development, catch up the normal children at 1 year after birth, reduce the inci- dence of disability. |
| |
Keywords: | neurobehavioral development early intervention high-risk neonates developmental quotient |
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录! |
|