肿瘤型假体重建膝关节周围原发性肿瘤切除后骨缺损

目的总结膝关节周围原发性骨肿瘤保肢手术中人工关节重建的疗效和并发症。方法回顾性分析我院1995年12月至2005年12月83例应用肿瘤型假体重建膝关节周围骨肿瘤切除后骨缺损的临床资料。其中骨肉瘤58例,多中心骨肉瘤2例,皮质旁骨肉瘤1例,恶性纤维组织细胞瘤4例,骨巨细胞瘤13例,平滑肌肉瘤1例,尤文肉瘤2例,软骨肉瘤2例。根据骨缺损重建部位分组：股骨下端组44例,胫骨上端组34例,全股骨置换组5例。结果所有患者均获得随访,随访时间12～130个月,平均41个月。局部复发6例,2例晚期感染,假体松动2例,无假体断裂;假体3、5年生存率分别为88．2％、82．1％。41例植骨患者形成皮质外骨桥。肢体肌肉骨骼肿瘤外科治疗重建术后功能评分：股骨下端组19．0—29．0分,平均25．0分;胫骨上端组17．0—28．0分,平均24．4分;全股骨置换组16．0—21．0分,平均19．0分。股骨下端组和胫骨上端组功能优于全股骨置换。结论肿瘤型人工关节重建膝关节周围骨肿瘤并发症发生率低,关节功能良好。

Endoprosthetic reconstruction after wide resection of primary bone tumor around the knee

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect and complication of the endoprosthetic reconstruction after wide resection of primary bone tumor around the knee. METHODS: The retrospective analysis was performed on 83 patients undergoing the prosthetic reconstruction after the resection of the primary tumor around the knee between December 1995 and December 2005. All the diagnoses were pathologically confirmed (58 patients with osteosarcoma, 2 with osteosarcomatosis, 1 with parosteal osteosarcoma, 4 with malignant fibrous histiocytoma, 13 with giant cell tumor of bone, 1 with leiomyosarcoma, 2 with Ewing's sarcoma, 2 with chondrosacoma). The distal femur group was involved in 44 patients, proximal tibia group in 34 (including 33 deficit in proximal tibia, 1 deficit both in proximal tibia and distal femur), total femur replacement group in 5. After operation, the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was used to evaluate the recovery of their corresponding functions. RESULTS: The follow-up for 12 - 130 months (with a median of 41 months) revealed that the 3-year survival rate of the prosthesis was 88.2%, and the 5-year survival rate was 82.1%. As for the complications, local recurrence developed in 6 patients, periprosthesis infection in 2 patients, aseptic loosening in 2 patients. The mean MSTS core was 25.0 (19.0 - 29.0) in the distal femur group, 24.4 (17.0 - 28.0) in the proximal tibia group, and 19.0 (16.0 - 21.0) in the total femur replacement group. As to the statistical analysis, the function of the former two groups were greater than the latter one (F = 11.666, P < 0.001), however, there was no significant difference between the former 2 groups (F = 0.813, P = 0.370). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, the tumor prosthesis gives a satisfactory functional outcome after the tumor around the knee is removed with a lower incidence of complication.