Osseointegration of fiber-reinforced composite implants: Histological and ultrastructural observations

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the bone tissue response to fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) in comparison with titanium (Ti) implants after 12 weeks of implantation in cancellous bone using histomorphometric and ultrastructural analysis.Materials and methodsThirty grit-blasted cylindrical FRC implants with BisGMA–TEGDMA polymer matrix were fabricated and divided into three groups: (1) 60 s light-cured FRC (FRC-L group), (2) 24 h polymerized FRC (FRC group), and (3) bioactive glass FRC (FRC–BAG group). Titanium implants were used as a control group. The surface analyses were performed with scanning electron microscopy and 3D SEM. The bone–implant contact (BIC) and bone area (BA) were determined using histomorphometry and SEM. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on Focused Ion Beam prepared samples of the intact bone–implant interface.ResultsThe FRC, FRC–BAG and Ti implants were integrated into host bone. In contrast, FRC-L implants had a consistent fibrous capsule around the circumference of the entire implant separating the implant from direct bone contact. The highest values of BIC were obtained with FRC–BAG (58 ± 11%) and Ti implants (54 ± 13%), followed by FRC implants (48 ± 10%), but no significant differences in BIC or BA were observed (p = 0.07, p = 0.06, respectively). TEM images showed a direct contact between nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite of bone and both FRC and FRC–BAG surfaces.ConclusionFiber-reinforced composite implants are capable of establishing a close bone contact comparable with the osseointegration of titanium implants having similar surface roughness.