首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

沙利度胺联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察
引用本文:徐光辉,李玉,张为民. 沙利度胺联合化疗治疗晚期胃癌的临床观察[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2008, 13(11): 1012-1014
作者姓名:徐光辉  李玉  张为民
作者单位:连云港市第一人民医院肿瘤科,江苏连云港,222002
摘    要:目的:观察沙利度胺(Thalidomide,反应停)联合奥沙利铂(L—OHP)、亚叶酸钙(CF)和氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)方案治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效和患者的耐受性,并与单用后3种药物化疗进行比较。方法:采用随机分组的方法将45例晚期胃癌患者分为Thalidomide+L—OHP+CF+5-FU方案组(联合用药组)24例与L—OHP+CF+5-FU方案组(化疗组)21例,观察两组的临床疗效和患者的耐受性。结果:联合用药组有效率54.2%(13/24),化疗组有效率42.9%(9/21),联合用药组有效率高于化疗组,但两组差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。联合用药组的疾病控制率为83.3%(20/24),化疗组为52.4%(11/21),两组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。联合用药组KPS评分的改善率为75%,化疗组KPS评分的改善率为42.9%,两组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。联合用药组的中位生存期及1年生存率均优于化疗组,但生存期比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。联合用药组的恶心呕吐发生率较化疗组低,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),但联合用药组的便秘的发生率较化疗组高,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);其余毒副反应均相似。结论:与单用化疗相比,沙利度胺联合化疗方案能增加晚期胃癌患者的疾病控制率,同时改善患者的生活质量,具有较轻的消化道反应,疗效是否更优有待于进一步扩大样本量进行临床随机对照研究。

关 键 词:晚期胃癌  沙利度胺  奥沙利铂  氟尿嘧啶  化学治疗

Treatment of advanced gastric cancer with the regimen of thalidomide, oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil
XU Guang-hui,LI Yu,ZHANG Wei-min. Treatment of advanced gastric cancer with the regimen of thalidomide, oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil[J]. Chinese Clinical Oncology, 2008, 13(11): 1012-1014
Authors:XU Guang-hui  LI Yu  ZHANG Wei-min
Affiliation:.( Department of Oncology, the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222002, China)
Abstract:Objective:This study was designed to investigate the clinical curative effects and tolerance of patients with advanced gastric cancer of treatment with the regimen of thalidomide, oxaliplatin ( L-OHP), leucovorin (CF) and fluorouracil (5-FU). We compared this treatment with the regimen of oxaliplatin, leucovorin and fluorouracil. Methods:In a randomized manner,45 patients with advanced gastric cancer were divided into combined treatment group(thalidomide + L-OHP + CF + 5-FU) and chemotherapy group ( L-OHP + CF + 5-FU). We compared the clinical curative effects and tolerance between two groups. Results : The overall responses rate for the combined treatment group and chemotherapy group were 54.2% (13/24) and 42.9% (9/21), respectively. The overall responses to the combined treatment group were higher than that of the chemotherapy group, but there were no statistically significant difference between two groups ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The clinically profitted rate from the combined treatment group and chemotherapy group were 83.3% ( 20/24 ) and 52. 4% ( 11/21 ), respectively. There were statistically significant difference between two groups ( P 〈 0. 05 ). The improvement rate of KPS score for the combined treatment group and chemotherapy group were 75% (18/24) and 42.9% (9/21), respectively. Obviously, the improvement of life quality to the combined treatment group were higher than that of the chemotherapy group (P 〈0. 05). The median survival and 1-year survival rate seen in the combined treatment group were better than that in the chemotherapy group, but there were no statistically significant difference between two groups (P 〉 0. 05 ). Nausea and vomiting were more pronounced in the chemotherapy group ( P 〈 0. 05 ) ; Constipation was more pronounced in the combined treatment group ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; Other toxcities were similar. Conclusion : Compared with chemotherapy regimen, thalidomide combined with chemotherapy reg imen obvi
Keywords:Advanced gastric cancer  Thalidomide  Oxaliplatin  Fluorouracil  Chemotherapy
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号