首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Chest wall thickness and decompression failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anatomic locations in needle thoracostomy
Institution:1. Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, SE-118 83 Stockholm, Sweden;2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, PO Box 3050, Doha, Qatar;3. Trauma Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar;4. Hamad Medical Corporation Ambulance Service, Medical City, Doha, Qatar;5. School of Health and Social Work, Paramedic Division, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield AL10 9AB, HERTS, UK;6. Neuroscience Institute, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar;7. Adult Cardiology, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar;8. Cardiology Research, Heart Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar;9. Helsinki University, Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00029 HUS, Finland;10. The Alfred Hospital, Emergency and Trauma Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;11. Department of Medicine Solna, 171 00, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
Abstract:IntroductionCurrent Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines recommend decompression for thoracic tension physiology using a 5-cm angiocatheter at the second intercostal space (ICS) on the midclavicular line (MCL). High failure rates occur. Through systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the chest wall thickness (CWT) of the 2nd ICS-MCL, the 4th/5th ICS at the anterior axillary line (AAL), the 4th/5th ICS mid axillary line (MAL) and needle thoracostomy failure rates using the currently recommended 5-cm angiocatheter.MethodsA comprehensive search of several databases from their inception to July 24, 2014 was conducted. The search was limited to the English language, and all study populations were included. Studies were appraised by two independent reviewers according to a priori defined PRISMA inclusion and exclusion criteria. Continuous outcomes (CWT) were evaluated using weighted mean difference and binary outcomes (failure with 5-cm needle) were assessed using incidence rate. Outcomes were pooled using the random-effects model.ResultsThe search resulted in 34,652 studies of which 15 were included for CWT analysis, 13 for NT effectiveness. Mean CWT was 42.79 mm (95% CI, 38.78–46.81) at 2nd ICS-MCL, 39.85 mm (95% CI, 28.70–51.00) at MAL, and 34.33 mm (95% CI, 28.20–40.47) at AAL (P = .08). Mean failure rate was 38% (95% CI, 24–54) at 2nd ICS-MCL, 31% (95% CI, 10–64) at MAL, and 13% (95% CI, 8–22) at AAL (P = .01).ConclusionEvidence from observational studies suggests that the 4th/5th ICS-AAL has the lowest predicted failure rate of needle decompression in multiple populations.Level of evidenceLevel 3 SR/MA with up to two negative criteria.Study typeTherapeutic.
Keywords:Needle decompression  Needle decompression location  Needle thoracostomy  Optimal positioning  Tension pneumothorax
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号