不同药物治疗方案对难治性抑郁症患者社会功能的影响

目的 研究不同药物治疗方案对难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者社会功能的影响.方法 对375例TRD患者随机分为帕罗西汀组、文拉法辛组、米氮平组、帕罗西汀+利培酮组、帕罗西汀+丙戊酸钠组、帕罗西汀+丁螺环酮组、帕罗西汀+曲唑酮组及帕罗西汀+甲状腺素组共8组进行双盲对照治疗8周,分别于基线、8周末评定社会功能缺陷筛选量表(SDSS),于基线、4周末及8周末评定健康调查问卷(SF-36)及17项汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17).结果 8组SDSS8周末评分与基线比较均差异有显著性(P＜0.01);SF-36社会功能因子分4周末、8周末与基线比较均差异有显著性(均P＜0.01),SF-36社会功能因子分(除外帕罗西汀组、文拉法辛组)8周末与4周末比较、8周末减分与4周末减分比较均差异有显著性(P＜0.05或P＜0.01).8组SDSS8周末减分帕罗西汀+利培酮组(7.05±6.39)分、米氮平组(6.53±4.75)分、帕罗西汀+甲状腺素组(5.14±4.94)分、帕罗西汀组(5.13±4.94)分、帕罗西汀+曲唑酮组(5.00±4.94)分、帕罗西汀+丙戊酸钠组(4.60±4.09)分、文拉法辛组(4.57±4.18)分、帕罗西汀+丁螺环酮组(4.24±4.95)分]比较差异有显著性(Z=2.076,P=0.038).两两比较帕罗西汀+利培酮组分别与文拉法辛组、帕罗西汀+丙戊酸钠组及帕罗西汀+丁螺环酮组比较均差异有显著性(P＜0.05),米氮平组与帕罗西汀+丁螺环酮组比较差异有显著性(P＜0.05).多元逐步回归分析显示:SDSS8周末减分与HAMD-17基线分、HAMD-17 8周末减分及本次病期相关.结论 8种药物治疗方案均能显著改善TRD患者的社会功能,但改善程度、改善时序不一;影响社会功能恢复的因素主要是抑郁症状严重程度、药物疗效及本次病期.

A comparsion study on the social functions promotion of different medicine treatment strategies on the patients with treatment-resistant depression

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of different medicine treatment strategies on the social functions promotion on the patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Methods 375 Patients with TRD were randomly grouped into 8 groups, and each group was received 8 weeks different treatment for paroxetine,venlafaxine, mirtazapine, paroxetine plus risperidone, paroxetine plus sodium valproate, paroxetine plus buspirone, paroxetine plus trazodone,or paroxetine plus thyroxine, respectively. The efficacy and social functions were evaluated with HAMD-17, SDSS and SF-36. Results There were significant difference in SDSS scores between 8th week and the baseline( P＜0.01 ) , and for social functions factor scores of SF-36 there was significant difference between 4th ,8th week and the baseline in each groups( P＜0.01 ). There were significant difference in social functions factor scores of SF-36 and subtracting scores between 4th and 8th week in all groups except group paroxetine and group venlafaxine(P ＜ 0.05 or P ＜ 0.01 ). There were significant difference in SDSS subtracting scores at 8th week among 8 groups( paroxetine plus risperidone group 7.05 ± 6.39, mirtazapine group 6.53 ± 4.75, paroxetine plusthyroxine group 5.14 ± 4.94, paroxetine group 5.13 ± 4.94 ,paroxetine plus trazodone group 5.00 ± 4.94, paroxetine plus sodium valproate group 4.60 ± 4.09, venlafaxine group 4.57 ± 4.18, paroxetine plus buspirone group 4.24 ± 4.95 ) ( Z = 2.076, P ＜ 0.05 ), between group paroxetine plus risperidone and group venlafaxine , group paroxetine plus sodium valproate, group paroxetine plus buspirone,as group mirtazapine and group paroxetine plus buspirone(P＜ 0.05 ), respectively. The influencing factors on improving social functions are the severity, improvement of depressive symptoms and latest onset time. Conclusions These 8 treatment strategies all can promote social functions on the patients with TRD. But the intensity and chronological order of improvement werent the same among 8 groups. The influencing factors on improving social functions are the severity, improvement of depressive symptoms and latest onset time.