首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Use of Intracardiac Compared With Transesophageal Echocardiography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Amulet Observational Study
Authors:Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk  Sergio Berti  Ole De Backer  Daniel Aguirre  Gaetano Fassini  Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez  Giuseppi Grassi  Claudio Tondo
Institution:1. Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark;2. Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Massa, Italy;3. Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark;4. Hospital Clinico San Borja Arriaran, Santiago, Chile;5. Heart Rhythm Center at Monzino Cardiac Center, University of Milan, Milan, Italy;6. Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain;7. Ospedale dell’Angelo, Venice, Italy
Abstract:ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare patient and procedural characteristics, clinical events, and left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion rates among implantation procedures guided either by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) or by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in the Amulet Observational Study.BackgroundTEE is standard for intraprocedural imaging during LAA occlusion. ICE is an alternative enabling local rather than general anesthesia.MethodsThe Amulet Observational Study is a prospective, multicenter, post-market study of the Amulet device in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk for thromboembolism from the LAA. Procedures were guided by ICE in the left atrium or TEE. A clinical events committee adjudicated serious adverse events. LAA closure was assessed by a core laboratory 1 to 3 months post-implantation.ResultsNine hundred fifty-five procedures were TEE guided and 130 (12%) were ICE guided. Local anesthesia was used in 93% of ICE-guided cases. Implantation success was >99% in both groups (p = 1.00). The procedure was longer (40 ± 31 min vs. 33 ± 21 min; p = 0.01) and contrast use higher (145 ± 157 ml vs. 98 ± 76 ml; p < 0.01) for ICE cases. LAA closure rate was 100% using ICE and 98% using TEE. Vascular access serious adverse events occurred in 0.8% of ICE patients and 1.5% of TEE patients (p = 0.52). Pericardial effusions or tamponade was observed at rates of 2.5% per year and 1.7% per year in ICE and TEE patients, respectively (p = 0.57). Rates of ischemic stroke (4.1% per year vs. 2.6% per year; p = 0.37) and major bleeding (8.2% per year vs. 10.6% per year; p = 0.44) did not differ significantly between ICE and TEE patients.ConclusionsAmulet LAA occlusion procedures guided by ICE and TEE resulted in comparable clinical event and LAA closure rates, without differences in procedural or vascular complications despite longer procedures and more contrast use.
Keywords:intracardiac echocardiography  left atrial appendage occlusion  transesophageal echocardiography  3D  3-dimensional  CT  computed tomography  ICE  intracardiac echocardiography  LAA  left atrial appendage  LAAO  left atrial appendage occlusion  LUPV  left upper pulmonary vein  OAC  oral anticoagulation  SAE  serious adverse event  SAPT  single-antiplatelet therapy  TEE  transesophageal echocardiography  TSP  transseptal puncture  TTE  transthoracic echocardiography
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号