Species formation by host shifting in avian malaria parasites

The malaria parasites (Apicomplexa: Haemosporida) of birds are believed to have diversified across the avian host phylogeny well after the origin of most major host lineages. Although many symbionts with direct transmission codiversify with their hosts, mechanisms of species formation in vector-borne parasites, including the role of host shifting, are poorly understood. Here, we examine the hosts of sister lineages in a phylogeny of 181 putative species of malaria parasites of New World terrestrial birds to determine the role of shifts between host taxa in the formation of new parasite species. We find that host shifting, often across host genera and families, is the rule. Sympatric speciation by host shifting would require local reproductive isolation as a prerequisite to divergent selection, but this mechanism is not supported by the generalized host-biting behavior of most vectors of avian malaria parasites. Instead, the geographic distribution of individual parasite lineages in diverse hosts suggests that species formation is predominantly allopatric and involves host expansion followed by local host–pathogen coevolution and secondary sympatry, resulting in local shifting of parasite lineages across hosts.Cospeciation of symbionts with their hosts has been recognized in parasites with strong vertical transmission (1, 2), viruses that spread by direct contact (3), and bacterial and viral symbionts passed from mother to offspring through the egg (4). Species formation in parasites that are transmitted between hosts by vectors is less well-understood (5, 6). Poor matching between the phylogenetic trees of vector-borne hemosporidian (malaria) parasites and their North American avian hosts suggests a predominance of host shifting compared with cospeciation (7) (reviewed in a broader context in ref. 8). Whether host shifting occurs primarily between closely related hosts and in geographic sympatry, and whether rates of host shifting followed by species formation are sufficient to explain the contemporary diversity of hemosporidian parasites, have not been determined.Many species of hemosporidian parasites have been described and named based primarily on the microscopic morphology of meronts and gametocytes in blood smears (9). The more recent discovery of hundreds of lineages based on DNA sequence variation in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cyt b) (5, 10, 11) requires, however, a different species concept based on analysis of independent components of the genome (12–16). Recent estimates of the rate of molecular evolution in hemosporidian mitochondrial genes imply that the contemporary malaria parasites of vertebrates might have descended from a common ancestor within the past 20 (17) or 40 Ma (18) or, perhaps, a longer time period (19). Although an appropriate calibration for the rate of hemosporidian evolution remains unsettled (20, 21), host shifting almost certainly has been frequent, likely across great host distances at times, over the recent history of the group.Speciation in sympatry (i.e., in the absence of geographic barriers to gene flow through local host specialization) might follow host shifting if mating between parasites was assortative with respect to vertebrate host or if different hosts imposed strong disruptive selection on parasites (22). However, despite some documented feeding preferences (23–25), dipteran vectors of avian malaria parasites do not seem to be sufficiently specialized to isolate populations of parasites on different hosts (26–29). In addition, many parasite species and many parasite lineages distinguished by DNA sequence variation occur locally across broad ranges of hosts without apparent differentiation, at least in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (30–32) and several nuclear markers (12, 14). Alternatively, host shifting in one allopatric population of a parasite species could be followed, after sufficient host–pathogen coevolution and evolutionary differentiation to produce reproductive incompatibility, by secondary sympatry, thereby increasing local parasite diversity.Here, we examine recent nodes in an mtDNA-based phylogeny of New World hemosporidian parasites to determine the degree to which lineage formation is associated with host shifting. Although our phylogenetic reconstruction is based on a single mitochondrial gene (cyt b), phylogenies based on genes from the mitochondrial, nuclear, and apicoplast genomes are broadly consistent for the relatively recent nodes considered in this analysis (6, 12–14, 33–35). In addition, analyses of avian hemosporidian parasites based on multiple independent markers have distinguished mtDNA-defined lineages on the basis of significant linkage disequilibrium (13).We distinguish as species the lineages that differ in their mtDNA cytochrome b gene sequence (by as few as 2 nt) and, for the most part, occur in either different hosts in the same local area or the same or different hosts in different geographic areas (32, 36). In some cases, closely related lineages occur in the same host locally. Sister lineages in this analysis differ by an average of about 1% sequence divergence, although some sequences separated by as little as a single nucleotide can exhibit consistent host or geographic differences. Inference concerning the mode of species formation is based primarily on host and geographic distributions of these hemosporidian mtDNA lineages. However, the correspondence between lineages and reproductively isolated species is poorly resolved (13, 37, 38). Each node was designated as either sympatric or allopatric depending on whether the descendant lineages occurred on the same West Indian islands or in the same regions within larger continental areas. The status of closely related parasite lineages occurring locally in the same host species is ambiguous, but these lineages might reflect genetic variation within a parasite species.Previous analyses have suggested that host shifting, rather than codivergence, predominates species formation in the hemosporidian parasites of birds (5, 7). We find this most frequently to be the case in this analysis, and we discuss whether species formation by host shifting occurs primarily in sympatry or allopatry.