Radical cystectomy in women: Impact of the robot-assisted versus open approach on surgical outcomes

ObjectivesTo perform a comparison of complications following open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RC) among women who undergo the procedure. Studies comparing robotic to open RC have been mixed without a clear delineation of which patients benefit the most from one modality vs. the other, leading to continued debate.Patients and methodsThis was a retrospective study of women who underwent either open or robotic RC at the MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1/2014 to 6/2018. Co-morbidities, pathologic data, and complications were assessed with descriptive statistics, along with uni- and multivariable logistic regression.Results122 women underwent either open (n = 76) or robotic (n = 46) RC. Open RC was associated with greater intraoperative blood loss (median EBL 775 ml vs. 300 ml, P < 0.001). In both uni- and multivariable analyses, open RC was associated with a greater odds of intraoperative transfusion compared to robotic RC (odds ratio 6.49, 95% CI 2.85–14.78, P < 0.001). Women undergoing open RC were also at greater odds of receiving 4 or more units of packed red blood cells (odds ratio 5.46 (1.75–17.02), P = 0.003). Robotic RC conferred a higher median lymph node yield (27 vs. 20 nodes, P, <0.001) and operative times (median 513 min vs. 391.5 min, P < 0.001). There were no differences in margin positivity, length of stay, or readmission rates at 30 and 90 days.ConclusionsRobotic RC was associated with a significantly lower risk of transfusion and EBL, and a higher median lymph node yield and operative time. Unique anatomic considerations may in part be responsible for these findings.