首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

腺苷脱氨酶诊断结核性胸腔积液的性能验证
引用本文:韩厅蓄,周南南,孙彬,董梅,徐婷,焦莉莉,李海霞,张晨,刘娟,王国洪,徐国宾. 腺苷脱氨酶诊断结核性胸腔积液的性能验证[J]. 临床检验杂志, 2019, 37(6): 413-417
作者姓名:韩厅蓄  周南南  孙彬  董梅  徐婷  焦莉莉  李海霞  张晨  刘娟  王国洪  徐国宾
作者单位:北京大学肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所检验科,恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,北京100142;解放军总医院第八医学中心检验科,北京,100091;首都医科大学附属北京天坛医院实验诊断中心,北京,100050;北京大学第一医院检验科,北京,100034
摘    要:目的验证腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)诊断结核性胸腔积液的性能。方法连续收集结核性胸腔积液43例、非结核性胸腔积液163例,用酶动力学法检测胸腔积液中ADA浓度。以非结核性胸腔积液组为对照,用ROC曲线计算ADA诊断结核性胸腔积液的临界值,并与既往文献报道的ADA诊断的敏感性和特异性进行比较。结果结核性胸腔积液组ADA浓度(中位数52.5 U/L)高于对照组(中位数9.8和10.6 U/L)(P<0.05)。临界值为25.0 U/L时,诊断结核性胸腔积液的敏感性和特异性分别为88.0%和91.0%。分析17篇QUADAS评分≥10分的文献发现,ADA诊断结核性胸腔积液的临界值为(28.1±12.8)U/L(10.2~55.8 U/L),Meta分析合并的诊断敏感性为89.0%(95%CI:87%~91%),合并的特异性为89.0%(95%CI:88%~91%)。结论 ADA诊断结核性胸腔积液的敏感性和特异性可达85%以上,但不同文献报告的诊断临界值有所差异。

关 键 词:结核性胸腔积液  腺苷脱氨酶  切值  META分析

Diagnostic performance of adenosine deaminase for tuberculous pleural effusion.
HAN Tingxu,ZHOU Nannan,SUN Bin,DONG Mei,XU Ting,JIAO Lili,LI Haixia,ZHANG Chen,LIU Juan,WANG Guohong,XU Guobin. Diagnostic performance of adenosine deaminase for tuberculous pleural effusion.[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science, 2019, 37(6): 413-417
Authors:HAN Tingxu  ZHOU Nannan  SUN Bin  DONG Mei  XU Ting  JIAO Lili  LI Haixia  ZHANG Chen  LIU Juan  WANG Guohong  XU Guobin
Affiliation:(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry ofEducation),Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute,Beijing 100142;Department of Clinical Laboratory,The Eighth MedicalCenter Of PLA General Hospital ,Beijing 100091;Laboratory Diagnosis Center,Beijing Tiantan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100050;Department of Clinical Laboratory,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China)
Abstract:Objective To verify the diagnostic value of adenosine deaminase(ADA) for tuberculous pleural effusion. Methods Forty-three cases with tuberculous pleural effusion and 163 cases with non-tuberculous pleural effusion were consecutively collected. The concentration of ADA in pleural effusion was determined by enzyme kinetics. The receiver operating characteristic(ROC) analysis curve was used to calculate the optimal cut-off value of ADA for diagnosing tuberculous pleural effusion based on the control groups with non-tuberculous pleural effusion. Meanwhile, the specificity and sensitivity of ADA level for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion were compared with previous reports. Results The concentration of ADA in tuberculous pleural effusion(median 52.5 U/L) was significantly higher than that in non-tuberculous pleural effusion(median 9.8 and 10.6 U/L)(P<0.05). With a cut-off level for ADA of 25 U/L, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity was 88.0% and 91.0%, respectively. A system review analyzed data from 17 studies with QUADAS score ≥10 points and revealed the cut-off value of ADA to be(28.1±12.8) U/L(range 10.2 to 55.8 U/L) with a sensitivity of 89%(95%CI: 87% to 91%) and a specificity of 89%(95%CI: 88% to 91%). Conclusion The specificity and sensitivity of ADA for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions should be up to over 85%, while the cut-off value of ADA from different literature reports were diverse.
Keywords:tuberculous pleural effusion  adenosine deaminase  cutoff value  Meta analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号