首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Parallel interhemispheric processing in hemineglect: Relation to visual field defects
Authors:Eva M Müller-Oehring  Tilman Schulte  Erich Kasten  Dorothe A Poggel  Iris Müller  Torsten Wüstenberg  Bernhard A Sabel
Institution:a Institute of Medical Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
b Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Road, Stanford, CA 94305-5723, USA
c SRI International, Neuroscience Program, 333 Ravenswood Ave., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
d Center for Innovative Visual Rehabilitation, Boston VA Medical Center, Mail Stop 151E, 150 South Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02130, USA
e Center of Biomedical Imaging, Boston University School of Medicine, Dept. of Anatomy and Neurobiology, 650 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA
f Dept. of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - University of Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
g Institute of Medical Psychology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
Abstract:Parallel interhemispheric processing is required to explore our visual environment and to integrate visual information from both hemifields simultaneously. Damage to the right temporo-parietal cortex can disrupt such parallel processes and result in neglect and visual extinction of stimuli in the left contralesional visual space. Neglected or extinguished stimuli can still be processed, yet without reaching the patient's awareness. Such unconscious processing has been attributed to structurally intact primary visual areas in neglect. To study whether unconscious parallel processing depends on visual functional integrity, we compared the performance of neglect patients with visual field defects (VFDs) (n = 11) and hemianopic patients with partial or complete blindness of one visual hemifield (n = 11) on redundant targets effects (RTE). The RTE manifests as faster reaction times to redundant paired (two stimuli, one in each hemifield) than single stimulation (in one hemifield). We found RTEs, i.e., unconscious processing, in neglect patients but not in hemianopic patients. Furthermore, neglect patients showed large crossed–uncrossed differences (CUDs), i.e., faster response times to ipsi- than contralesional hemifield stimulation, reflecting a difference in processing speed for single stimuli in the two hemispheres that were correlated with VFDs and visual extinction. The finding that extinction, but not RTE, was correlated with the CUD suggests that under competitive bilateral stimulus conditions the delayed contralesional visual field input may not be detected by the intact left hemisphere, which presumably mediates the task given the impairment of the right hemisphere. By contrast, unconscious parallel processing of contralesional stimuli (RTE) occurred even when contralesional visual field input is lacking (VFD) or delayed (CUD) and is possibly mediated via subcortical visual pathways.
Keywords:Sensorimotor  Visuospatial neglect  Extinction  Hemianopia  Unconscious stimulus processing  Posterior brain lesion
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号