首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

超声造影与多层螺旋CT增强扫描在肾肿瘤诊断中的对照研究
引用本文:刘阳,范小明,叶瑞忠,黄志良,王立刚,李锋之.超声造影与多层螺旋CT增强扫描在肾肿瘤诊断中的对照研究[J].中国临床保健杂志,2016(3):270-272.
作者姓名:刘阳  范小明  叶瑞忠  黄志良  王立刚  李锋之
作者单位:浙江省人民医院超声科,杭州,310014
摘    要:目的比较超声造影与多层螺旋CT增强扫描对肾肿瘤的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析55例经手术病理证实的且有完整临床资料的肾肿瘤的超声造影及多层螺旋CT增强扫描表现特点,并以手术病理结果为参考标准,评价超声造影与多层螺旋CT增强扫描诊断肾肿瘤的价值。结果 55例病灶中,34例为恶性病变,21例为良性病变;超声造影诊断肾肿瘤的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为90.6%、78.3%、85.3%、85.7%;多层螺旋CT增强扫描诊断肾肿瘤的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为87.5%、73.9%、82.3%、81.0%;两种检查方法检查结果差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论超声造影与多层螺旋CT增强扫描对于肾肿瘤的诊断效果相当,临床可以根据检查技术的特点,为不同的患者选择适宜的检查。

关 键 词:肾肿瘤  超声检查  介入性  体层摄影术  螺旋计算机
收稿时间:2016/3/1 0:00:00

Controlled studies of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of renal tumor
Liu Yang,Fan Xiaoming,Ye Ruizhong,Huang Zhiliang,Wang Ligang and Li Fengzhi.Controlled studies of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of renal tumor[J].Chinese JOurnal of Clinical Healthcare,2016(3):270-272.
Authors:Liu Yang  Fan Xiaoming  Ye Ruizhong  Huang Zhiliang  Wang Ligang and Li Fengzhi
Institution:Department of Ultrasonography,Zhejiang Provincial People''s Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,China,Department of Ultrasonography,Zhejiang Provincial People''s Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,China,Department of Ultrasonography,Zhejiang Provincial People''s Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,China,Department of Ultrasonography,Zhejiang Provincial People''s Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,China,Department of Ultrasonography,Zhejiang Provincial People''s Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,China and Department of Ultrasonography,Zhejiang Provincial People''s Hospital,Hangzhou 310014,China
Abstract:Objective To compared the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS)with contrast-en-hanced CT(CECT)in the diagnosis of renal tumor.Methods The CEUS and CECT features of 55 cases of renal tumor confirmed by operation and pathology were retrospectively analyzed,evaluate the value of CEUS and CECT in the diagnosis of renal tumor.Results Of the 55 cases,21 cases showed benign lesions,and 34 cases malignant lesions.The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of the CEUS were 90. 6%,78.3%,85.3%,and 85.7%,respectively;and the sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,and negative predictive value of the CECT were 87.5%,73.9%,82.3%,81.0%.There was no significant difference in the results between two methods(P >0.05).Conclusion CEUS can get the same effect as the CECT.The suit-able method is selected according to the characteristics of the inspection technology.
Keywords:Kidney neoplasms  Ultrasonography  interventional  Tomography  Spiral computed
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国临床保健杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国临床保健杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号