| Abstract: | The objective of this study was to determine the relative sensitivity of detecting Trichomonas vaginalis in endocervical as compared to ectocervical Papanicolaou-stained smears. The average number of organisms in 10 (200×) high-power fields (hpf) per smear was used for comparing the presence of trichomonads in the two smear types. In every pair of ectocervical-endocervical smears, there were always more trichomonads in the ectocervical smear. Fifty percent of cases showed at least 25 more trichomonads per 200× hpf in the ectocervical smear than in the endocervical smear. In 20 of 50 cases (40%), trichomonads were present only in the ectocervical smear. The organisms were found only in the endocervical smears of women with a heavier ectocervical trichomonad burden. In conclusion, trichomonads are detected in the Papanicolaou-stained ectocervical smear more often than in the endocervical smear; therefore, examination of an adequate ectocervical smear has greater utility than the endocervical smear for the diagnosis of trichomoniasis. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;14:273–276. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
