首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

跟骨压缩性骨折切开复位与撬拨复位治疗比较
引用本文:韩立新,李旭芬,李凤新. 跟骨压缩性骨折切开复位与撬拨复位治疗比较[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2004, 6(6): 701-703
作者姓名:韩立新  李旭芬  李凤新
作者单位:450041,河南省郑州市,中国长城铝业公司总医院骨科
摘    要:目的评价切开复位与撬拨复位治疗跟骨骨折的疗效。方法1997年6月~2002年12月收治跟骨关节压缩性骨折62例,其中切开复位33例,撬拨复位29例。结果按Maryland足部评分系统评价术后功能,切开复位组优良率明显高于撬拨复位组。结论切开复位能较好的恢复跟骨的解剖结构,从而取得较好疗效。

关 键 词:跟骨骨折 切开复位 撬拨复位
文章编号:1671-7600(2004)06-0701-03
修稿时间:2003-08-08

Open reduction and poking reduction for treatment of calcaneal compression fractures
HAN Li-xin,LI Xu-fen,LI Feng-xin. Open reduction and poking reduction for treatment of calcaneal compression fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2004, 6(6): 701-703
Authors:HAN Li-xin  LI Xu-fen  LI Feng-xin
Affiliation:HAN Li-xin,LI Xu-fen,LI Feng-xin. Department of Orthopaedics,The General Hospital of the Great Wall Aluminum CO.,Zhengzhou,Henan 450041,China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of open reduction and poking reduction in the treatment of calcaneal compression fractures. Method From June 1997 to December 2002, 62 cases of calcaneal compression fracture sought for treatment in our department. 33 of them were treated with open reduction, and 29 with poking reduction. Results The Maryland foot assessment score system was used for evaluation. The excellent and good rate was significantly higher for those treated by open reduction than by poking reduction. Conclusion Open reduction can achieve better calcaneal anatomic reduction and thus better treatment results.
Keywords:Calcaneal fracture  Open reduction  Poking reduction
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号