持续封闭负压引流治疗骨科创伤患者的可行性分析

目的 分析持续封闭负压引流治疗骨科创伤患者的可行性.方法 将我院收治的60例骨科创伤患者随机平均分为对照组和治疗组,对照组患者主要采用传统创面处理方法进行治疗,治疗组患者实施持续封闭负压引流治疗,并观察两组治疗效果.结果 与对照组患者相比,治疗组患者平均住院时间与创面愈合时间明显比对照组短,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.在治疗组中,26例患者治疗为优,4例患者治疗为良,而对照组患者中9例患者治疗为优,11例患者治疗为良,10例患者治疗为差.两组患者治疗有效率有显著差异（P＜0.05）.治疗组患者治疗的总有效率为100％,对照组患者治疗总有效率为66.67％.两组患者治疗有效率比较有显著差异（P＜0.05）.结论 持续封闭负压引流治疗骨科创伤患者效果显著,创面愈合时间短,可行性好,值得临床推广使用.

Feasibility Analysis of Continuous Closed Negative Pressure Drainage Treatment of Trauma Patients in Department of Orthopedics

Objective To analyze the feasibility of the treatment for closed negative pressure drainage treatment of patients in the De- partment of Orthopedics. Methods A total of 60 cases of trauma patients in the Department of Orthopedics in the hospital were divided into the control group and the treatment group. Traditional wound treatment was used in the control group, and continuous negative pressure drainage treatment was used in the treatment group. The therapeutic effect of two groups was observed. Results Compared with the control group, the average hospitalization time and wound healing time of the patients in the treatment group was significantly shorter than the con- trol group, with statistically significant difference （ P 〈 0.05 ） ; in the treatment group, 26 patients were excellent, and 4 patients were good; and in the control group, 9 patients were excellent, 11 patients were good, and 10 patients were poor. There was significant difference in patients＇ treatment effective rate of the two groups（P 〈0.05）. The patients in the treatment group the total effective rate of treatment was 100%, while the patients in the control group the total effective rate of treatment was 66.67%. The difference of the patients＇ effective treatment rate was statistically significant （ P 〈 0.05 ）. Conclusion There is significant effect in continuous negative pressure drainage in the treatment of trauma patients in Department of Orthopedics, with short wound healing time, good feasibility, and is worthy of clinical use.