首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Suicide screening scales may not adequately predict disposition of suicidal patients from the emergency department
Authors:Samuel Mullinax  Christen E. Chalmers  Jesse Brennan  Gary M. Vilke  Kimberly Nordstrom  Michael P. Wilson
Affiliation:1. Department of Emergency Medicine Behavioral Emergences Research (DEMBER) lab, 4301 West Markham St, #584, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States;2. Department of Emergency Medicine, UC San Diego Health System, University of California San Diego, 200 W Arbor Dr, San Diego, CA 92103, United States;3. Office of Behavioral Health, State of Colorado, 3824 W Princeton Cir, Denver, CO 80236, United States;4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado at Denver, 1201 Larimer St, Denver, CO 80204, United States;5. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham St, #584, Little Rock, AR 72205, United States
Abstract:

Background

Suicide screening scales have been advocated for use in the ED setting. However, it is currently unknown whether patients classified as low-risk on these scales can be safely discharged from the emergency department. This study evaluated the utility of three commonly-used suicide screening tools in the emergency department to predict ED disposition, with special interest in discharge among low-risk patients.

Methods

This prospective observational study enrolled a convenience sample of patients who answered “yes” to a triage suicidal ideation question in an urban academic emergency department. Patients were administered the weighted modified SADPERSONS Scale, Suicide Assessment Five-step Evaluation and Triage, and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Patients who subsequently received a psychiatric evaluation were included, and the utility of these screening tools to predict disposition was evaluated.

Results

276 subjects completed all three suicide screening tools and were included in data analyses. Eighty-two patients (30%) were admitted or transferred. Three patients (1%) died by suicide within one year of enrollment; one was hospitalized at the end of his or her enrollment visit, dying by suicide seven months later and the other two were discharged, dying by suicide nine and ten months later, respectively. The screening tools exhibited modest negative predictive values (range: 0.66–0.73).

Conclusion

Three suicide screening tools displayed modest ability to predict the disposition of patients who presented to an emergency department with suicidal ideation. This study supports the current ACEP clinical policy on psychiatric patients which states that screening tools should not be used in isolation to guide disposition decisions of suicidal patients from the ED.
Keywords:Suicide  Suicidal ideation  Mass screening
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号