Differentiating transcranial magnetic stimulation cortical and auditory responses via single pulse and paired pulse protocols: A TMS-EEG study |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada;2. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada;3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;4. Cognitive Neuroscience Unit, School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;5. Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;6. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;7. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | ObjectiveWe measured the neurophysiological responses of both active and sham transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for both single pulse (SP) and paired pulse (PP; long interval cortical inhibition (LICI)) paradigms using TMS-EEG (electroencephalography).MethodsNineteen healthy subjects received active and sham (coil 90° tilted and touching the scalp) SP and PP TMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). We measured excitability through SP TMS and inhibition (i.e., cortical inhibition (CI)) through PP TMS.ResultsCortical excitability indexed by area under the curve (AUC(25-275ms)) was significantly higher in the active compared to sham stimulation (F(1,18) = 43.737, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.708). Moreover, the amplitude of N100-P200 complex was significantly larger (F(1,18) = 9.118, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.336) with active stimulation (10.38 ± 9.576 µV) compared to sham (4.295 ± 2.323 µV). Significant interaction effects were also observed between active and sham stimulation for both the SP and PP (i.e., LICI) cortical responses. Finally, only active stimulation (CI = 0.64 ± 0.23, p < 0.001) resulted in significant cortical inhibition.ConclusionThe significant differences between active and sham stimulation in both excitatory and inhibitory neurophysiological responses showed that active stimulation elicits responses from the cortex that are different from the non-specific effects of sham stimulation.SignificanceOur study reaffirms that TMS-EEG represents an effective tool to evaluate cortical neurophysiology with high fidelity. |
| |
| Keywords: | TMS-EEG Sham TMS Long interval cortical inhibition TMS-evoked potential TMS" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0030" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation EEG" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0040" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Electroencephalography TEP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0050" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" TMS Evoked Potential AEP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0060" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Auditory Evoked Potential SEP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0070" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Somatosensory Evoked Potential PEP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0080" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Peripherally Evoked Potential SP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0090" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Single Pulse PP" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0100" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Paired Pulse LICI" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0110" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" long interval cortical inhibition CI" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0120" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Cortical Inhibition AUC" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0130" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Area Under the Curve DLPFC" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0140" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex MRI" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0150" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Magnetic Resonance Imaging MNI" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0160" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Montreal Neurological Institute APB" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0170" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Abductor Pollicis Brevis ICA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" k0180" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" Independent Component Analysis |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
