首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

左心室大小和术后收缩压变化与心脏再同步化治疗疗效的关系
引用本文:惠玲玲,张卫泽,陈永清,马凌,韩娟萍,张玉秀.左心室大小和术后收缩压变化与心脏再同步化治疗疗效的关系[J].心脏杂志,2011,23(6):741-743.
作者姓名:惠玲玲  张卫泽  陈永清  马凌  韩娟萍  张玉秀
作者单位:1.第四军医大学西京医院心内科,陕西 西安 710032;2.兰州军区兰州总医院心内科,甘肃 兰州 730050
摘    要:目的:观察左心室(LV)大小和术后急性期收缩压(SBP) 变化对心脏再同步化治疗(CRT )疗效的影响。方法: 分别于术前及术后 6 个月评估21例CRT患者的心功能及超声参数。至术后 6个月时,NYHA 至少下降1级,左室收缩末容积(LVESV)至少降低10%的为CRT反应较好组,余为反应较差组。结果: 术后6个月时,反应较好组和其基线期相比左室射血分数(LVEF)显著升高[(32±9)% vs. (45±10)%,P<0.05)]、左室舒张末容积(LVEDV)显著降低[(237±54)ml vs. (151±45) ml,P<0.05]、左室舒张末内径(LVEDD)显著降低[(68±8) mm vs. (55±6) mm,P<0.05]、左室收缩末容积(LVESV)显著降低[(165±46) ml vs. (84±31) ml,P=0.01]、NYHA 的分级由术前6/8(III/IV)降至术后11/3(II/III);反应较差组和术前相比有所改善,未达到统计学意义。反应较好组术后7d SBP均显著升高(P<0.05),反应较差组下降。结论: 心力衰竭患者CRT治疗反应较好与治疗前左心室较小和术后急性期SBP升高有关联性。

关 键 词:心脏再同步化治疗    心力衰竭    超声心动图    收缩压
收稿时间:2011-01-22

Effects of left ventricular geometry and postoperative blood pressure changes on efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy
HUI Ling-ling,ZHANG Wei-ze,CHEN Yong-qing,MA Ling,HAN Juan-ping,ZHANG Yu-xiu.Effects of left ventricular geometry and postoperative blood pressure changes on efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy[J].Chinese Heart Journal,2011,23(6):741-743.
Authors:HUI Ling-ling  ZHANG Wei-ze  CHEN Yong-qing  MA Ling  HAN Juan-ping  ZHANG Yu-xiu
Institution:HUI Ling-ling1,ZHANG Wei-ze2,CHEN Yong-qing2,MA Ling2,HAN Juan-ping2,ZHANG Yu-xiu2(1.Department of Cardiology,Xijing Hospital,Fourth Military Medical University,Xi' an 710032,Shaanxi,China,2.Department of Cardiology,Lanzhou General Hospital,Lanzhou Military Area Command,Lanzhou 730050,Gansu,China)
Abstract:AIM:To study the effects of left ventricular (LV) geometry and postoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP) changes on the efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: Twenty-one CRT recipients were included in the study. Before CRT and 6 months after, clinical and echocardigraphic evaluations were performed. At 6 months after CRT, the patients with a decrease of NYHA≥1 and a decrease of LVESV ≥10% were classified as CRT-responders and the others were classified as CRT-nonresponders. RESULTS: At baseline, no significant difference was observed in all patients except that CRT-responders had smaller LVEDD and better renal function. At 6 months after CRT, LVEF increased [(32±9)% vs. (45±10)%, P<0.05], whereas NYHA (6/8, III/IV vs. 11/3, II/III), LVEDD [(68±8)mm vs.(55±6)mm, P<0.05], LVEDV [(237±54)ml vs.(151±45)ml, P<0.05] and LVESV [(165±46) ml vs. (84±31), P=0.01] decreased in CRT-responders. No significant improvement was observed in CRT-nonresponders. A marked increase of SBP was found in CRT-responders. CONCLUSION: Less-altered ventricular geometry, smaller LVEDD and a prompt SBP rise just after CRT may predict a better response in CRT recipients.
Keywords:cardiac resynchronization therapy  Cardiac resynchronization therapy responders  Coronary heart failure  echocardiogram  Systolic blood pressure  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《心脏杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《心脏杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号