首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

不同频率rTMS联合帕罗西汀治疗广泛性焦虑障碍临床研究
引用本文:刘瑞云,赵琳,谷世娜,王先震,李娟,张蒙蒙,任慧聪,张朝辉.不同频率rTMS联合帕罗西汀治疗广泛性焦虑障碍临床研究[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2020,26(2):28-31,51.
作者姓名:刘瑞云  赵琳  谷世娜  王先震  李娟  张蒙蒙  任慧聪  张朝辉
作者单位:458030 河南·鹤壁 鹤壁市人民医院;453002 河南·新乡 新乡医学院第二附属医院;453100 河南·卫辉 新乡医学院第一附属医院;472000 河南·三门峡 三门峡市精神卫生中心
基金项目:河南省教育厅重点科研项目;实验室开放基金;河南省医学科技攻关计划;河南省基础与前沿技术研究计划
摘    要:目的探讨高、低频率重复经颅磁刺激联合帕罗西汀治疗广泛性焦虑障碍患者的疗效.方法将90例广泛性焦虑障碍患者按照治疗方法不同分为低频组、高频组与对照组,每组30例,均常规口服帕罗西汀治疗,在此基础上低频组重复经颅磁刺激频率为1 Hz、高频组重复经颅磁刺激频率为10 Hz,对照组患者置于相同的环境,线圈不通电,既无电流脉冲,只施予同样次数的声音刺激,观察4周.治疗前后采月汉密顿焦虑量表、焦虑自评量表评定焦虑症状改善状况.结果治疗前3组汉密顿焦虑量表、焦虑自评量表评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后3组汉密顿焦虑量表及焦虑自评量表评分均较治疗前显著下降(P<0.01).治疗第1周末高频组、低频组汉密顿焦虑量表评分减分率显著低于对照组(P<0.05),焦虑自评量表评分减分率3组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);第2周末高频组汉密顿焦虑量表评分显著低于对照组、减分率显著高于低频组及对照组(P<0.05或0.01);治疗第4周末高频组、低频组汉密顿焦虑量表及焦虑自评量表评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.01)、减分率均显著高于对照组(P<0.01).结论低频及高频重复经颅磁刺激联合帕罗西汀治疗广泛性焦虑障碍患者具有协同增效作用,疗效显著,高频治疗起效更快,有利于提高患者的治疗依从性,优于单用抗抑郁剂治疗.

关 键 词:广泛性焦虑障碍  心身疾病  重复经颅磁刺激  帕罗西汀  汉密顿焦虑量表  焦虑自评量表

Clinical study of rTMS with different frequencies and paroxetine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder
Liu Ruiyun,Zhao Lin,Gu Shina,Wang Xianzhen,Li Juan,Zhang Mengmeng,Ren Huicong,Zhang Zhaohui.Clinical study of rTMS with different frequencies and paroxetine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder[J].Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases,2020,26(2):28-31,51.
Authors:Liu Ruiyun  Zhao Lin  Gu Shina  Wang Xianzhen  Li Juan  Zhang Mengmeng  Ren Huicong  Zhang Zhaohui
Institution:(Hebi People's Hospital,Hebi 458030,Henan,China;不详)
Abstract:Objective To investigate the efficacy of high and low frequency rTMS combined with paroxetine in the treatment of patients with generalized anxiety disorder.Methods 90 patients with GAD were divided into low frequency group,high frequency group and control group according to different treatment methods,30 cases in each group.All were treated with paroxetine orally.On this basis,the rTMS frequency of the low frequency group was 1 Hz,and the rTMS frequency of the high frequency group was 10 Hz.The patients in the control group were placed in the same environment,the coil was not energized.No current pulse was given,and only the same number of sound stimuli were applied,and observed for 4 weeks.Before and after treatment,HAMA and SAS were used to evaluate the improvement of anxiety symptoms.Results There was no significant difference in HAMA and SAS scores among the three groups before treatment(P>0.05).After treatment,the HAMA and SAS scores in the three groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.01).At the end of the first week of treatment,the reduction rate of Hamilton anxiety scale score in the high-frequency group and the low-frequency group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05),There was no statistically significant difference of SAS(P>0.05).After 2 weeks of treatment,the HAMA score of the high frequency group was significantly lower than the control group,and the reduction rate was significantly higher than that of the low frequency group and the control group(P<0.05 or 0.01).After 4 weeks of treatment,the HAMA and SAS scores in the high-frequency group and the low-frequency group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.01),and the reduction rates were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.01).Conclusions Low-frequency and high-frequency rTMS combined with paroxetine has a synergistic effect on patients with generalized anxiety disorder,and the effect is significant.High-frequency treatment has a faster onset of treatment,which is beneficial to improve the patient's treatment compliance.It is better than antidepressant alone.
Keywords:Generalized anxiety disorder  psychosomatic disorders  rTMS  paroxetine  HAMA  SAS
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号