微创软通道穿刺与立体定向硬通道穿刺治疗高血压脑出血的对照研究

目的为基底节区高血压脑出血的微创方式的选择提供依据。方法选择基底节区高血压脑出血患者80例,随机分为软通道组和硬通道组。两组中按血肿大小又分别分为小量组（25~40ml）和大量组（41~60ml）。两组均于早期行血肿清除,硬通道组在WTF-1型定向仪导引下行穿刺清除血肿。四组患者在治疗前和治疗后1周、2周分别行Glasgow Coma Scale（GCS）量表评分;治疗前和治疗后14d分别行Scandinavian（SSS）卒中评分量表评分;治疗后3个月行改良Rankin Scale（MRS）量表评分。结果两组手术后GCS评分结果差异有统计学意义,硬通道小量组与软通道小量组差异有统计学意义,硬通道小量组优于软通道小量组。结论通过评价,在小血肿组,应用WTF-1型定向仪硬通道有优势。

Comparative study of soft-channel and hard-channel minimally invasive puncture in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage

Objective To provide scientific guidance for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage by microinvasive surgery. Methods Eighty patients with basal ganglia hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage were randomly divided into the soft-channel group and the hard-channel group, which were further divided into the little quantity hemorrhage subgroup (25~40 ml) and large quantity hemorrhage subgroup (41~60 ml) according to the size of hematoma. Patients in the soft-channel group were treated with microi...