首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Systematic errors in middle-aged women's estimates of energy intake: comparing three self-report measures to total energy expenditure from doubly labeled water
Authors:Hebert James R  Ebbeling Cara B  Matthews Charles E  Hurley Thomas G  MA Yunsheng  Druker Susan  Clemow Lynn
Affiliation:

a Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the Nutrition Research Center, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

b Norman J. Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA

c Department of Endocrinology, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

d Division of Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

e Department of Psychiatry, UMDNJ, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Clinical Academic Building – 2200, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

Abstract:PURPOSE: To evaluate energy intake (EI) derived from a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), seven-day dietary recall (7DDR), and seven 24-hour dietary recall interviews (24HR) for reporting errors associated with social desirability and social approval. METHODS: The FFQ and 7DDR were administered once before and once after a 14-day metabolic period during which total energy expenditure was determined using the doubly labeled water method (TEEdlw). Seven 24HR were conducted over the 14-day period. Data obtained from 80 healthy women (mean age = 49.1 years) were fit to linear regression models in which the EI estimates were the dependent variables and estimates of social desirability and social approval traits, body mass index [weight (kg)/ height (m)2], and TEEdlw were fit as independent variables. RESULTS: indicated that in college-educated women there was an underestimate associated with social desirability on the FFQ (-42.24 kcal/day/point on the social desirability scale; 95% CI:–75.48, -9.00). For college-educated women with an average social desirability score (17 points) this would equal an underestimate of 507 kcal/day compared to women with the minimum score (4 points). The 7DDR was associated with a differential effect of social approval when comparing by education; i.e., there was a difference of 36.35 kcal/day/point between the two groups (-14.69 in women with ≥college and 21.66 in women with CONCLUSIONS: Social desirability and social approval distort energy intake estimates from structured questionnaires, in a manner that appears to vary by educational status. Results observed have important implications for subject recruitment, data collection, and for methods of detection and control of biases in epidemiologic studies.
Keywords:Bias   Diet   Nutrition Assessment   Personality Assessment   Questionnaires   Social Desirability   Doubly Labeled Water   Women
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号