Accuracy of office hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia

In the last decade the advantages of office hysteroscopy performed without cervical dilatation and/or anaesthesia were fully demonstrated. Many authors consider office hysteroscopy the gold standard diagnostic method in the diagnosis of intrauterine pathology, with high accuracy and compliance. The best sensitivity and specificity are reached in the diagnosis of focal lesions as submucous myomas and polyps but controversy still persists regarding hysteroscopic accuracy in the definition of endometrial hyperplasia. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of outpatient hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and to compare hysteroscopic findings with histology. From April 2000 to May 2002, 145 diagnostic office hysteroscopies were performed at the Euganea Medica clinic. Sensitivity in the detection of endometrial hyperplasia was 89.36%, specificity 91.96%, positive predictive value (PPV) 82.36% while negative predictive value (NPV) reached 95.37%. Uniformity of histology associated with outpatient mini-invasivity and high compliance favour office hysteroscopy and represent important elements in its diffusion as a first level diagnostic method even in the diagnosis of hyperplasia.