少数民族边远地区医学院校硕士研究生导师队伍的管理与思考

目的 分析地处广西少数民族边远地区的某医学院硕士研究生导师队伍的建设与管理现状，研究其硕士生导师队伍建设与管理过程中存在的主要问题。方法 参考国家和学校有关研究生教育管理文件和硕士研究生导师遴选、培养和管理等规章制度以及相关文献设计调查问卷，选取右江民族医学院66 名硕士研究生导师进行调查。结果 49.13% 的导师认为学术型导师遴选条件中对科研成果、教学成果或其他成果的要求欠合理，38.60% 的导师认为专业型导师遴选条件中对主持课题及经费的要求不合理，29.82% 的导师认为专业型导师遴选条件中对学历、职称和临床实践工作时间的要求欠合理；对其他遴选条件要求的认可程度均在80% 以上；但有50.87% 的导师认为遴选条件存在标准量化不够等问题。5 年来有超过30% 的导师未单次外出学习（进修）超过3 个月，54.40% 的导师参加导师培训的次数不超过1 次，50.87% 的导师未参与制定本学科、专业研究生培养方案。85.97% 的导师认为每人每届指导的研究生不宜超过2 人。80.70% 的导师认为应该对硕导进行科研方法的培训。68.42% 的导师对学校的导师考核和评价制度不满意。结论 当前硕士生导师队伍管理还存在一些不足，相关管理体系有待进一步改革与完善。

Analysis on the management status of postgraduate supervisors in medical university in minority and remote areas

Objective To analyze the management status of postgraduate supervisors in a college of medicine in minority and remote areas in Guangxi, and to find out the main problems existing in the process of the construction and management of the master degree supervisor team, and to provide reference for scientifically and reasonably building and managing a supervisor team. Methods Refer to the national and school related graduate education management documents and master degree supervisors selection, training, and management regulations and related literature design questionnaires,and randomly select 66 master degree supervisorsin our medical school to investigate. Results 49.13% of the tutors believe that the requirements for scientific research results, teaching results, or other results in the selection of academic tutors are unreasonable, and 38.60% of tutors believe that the requirements for presiding projects and funding are unreasonable in the selection conditions of professional tutors, and 29.82% of tutors believe that the requirements for academic qualifications,professional titles, and clinical practice work time in professional tutor selection conditions are unreasonable; the accreditation level for other selection criteria requirements is more than 80%; however, 50.87% of tutors believe that there is not enough standard quantification of selection criteria. Over 30% of tutors have no access to going out to study (learning) for more than 3 months in a 5 year period, 54.40% of tutors have attended tutor training less than once, and 50.87% of tutors have not participated in the development of this discipline and graduate student training program. 85.97% of the tutors think that maximum number for enrolling new graduate student for each tutor is 2. 80.70% of tutors believe that they need further training in scientific research methods. 68.42% of tutors were not satisfied with the school’s tutor assessment and evaluation system. Conclusions Currently, there are still many problems in the management of master tutors for the medical school,and the related management system needs further reform and improvement.