首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

弱阿片药物与低剂量强阿片药物治疗中度癌痛的Meta分析与GRADE评价
引用本文:赵德华,楚明明,陈静,贾霖,韩建军,何霞,龙小庆,王继生.弱阿片药物与低剂量强阿片药物治疗中度癌痛的Meta分析与GRADE评价[J].中国医院药学杂志,2018,38(18):1957-1963.
作者姓名:赵德华  楚明明  陈静  贾霖  韩建军  何霞  龙小庆  王继生
作者单位:1. 绵阳市第三人民医院(四川省精神卫生中心)临床药学科, 四川 绵阳 621000; 2. 陆军军医大学第二附属医院临床药学科, 重庆 400037
摘    要:目的:评价弱阿片类药物(Weak Opioids,WO)与低剂量强阿片类药物(Low-Dose Strong Opioids,LDSO)治疗中度癌痛的有效性和安全性。方法:以"吗啡","羟考酮","曲马多","可待因","中度癌痛"为关键词对Pubmed、EMbase、Cochrane Library、中国知网、万方、维普等数据库进行检索。以临床疗效为主要结局、毒副反应(恶心呕吐,嗜睡,厌食和便秘)为次要结局,采用软件Review Manager 5.3对数据进行处理,并采用软件GRADE profiler 3.6对结果证据质量进行评级。结果:纳入4项随机对照研究,共计708例患者。结果表明LDSO对中度癌痛的控制要优于WOOR=3.50,95% CI(2.39 to 5.13),P<0.000 01]。而在毒副反应方面,两组的恶心呕吐OR=0.92,95% CI(0.59 to 1.42),P=0.69]、嗜睡OR=1.23,95% CI(0.74 to 2.05),P=0.42]、厌食OR=1.19,95% CI(0.59 to 2.37),P=0.63] 以及便秘OR=1.34,95% CI(0.87 to 2.07),P=0.19] 均无显著性差异。缓解率和各毒副反应的GRADE证据评价级均为中级。结论:在治疗中度癌痛中,LDSO的疗效优于WO,且耐受性良好,提示临床可以采用弱化二阶梯方案,将LDSO用于治疗中度癌痛。

关 键 词:强阿片药物  弱阿片药物  中度癌痛  Meta分析  GRADE评价  
收稿时间:2017-12-21

Meta-analysis and GRADE profile of weak opioids versus low dose strong opioids in the treatment of moderate cancer pain
ZHAO De-hua,CHU Ming-ming,CHEN Jing,JIA Lin,HAN Jian-jun,HE Xia,LONG Xiao-qing,WANG Ji-sheng.Meta-analysis and GRADE profile of weak opioids versus low dose strong opioids in the treatment of moderate cancer pain[J].Chinese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy,2018,38(18):1957-1963.
Authors:ZHAO De-hua  CHU Ming-ming  CHEN Jing  JIA Lin  HAN Jian-jun  HE Xia  LONG Xiao-qing  WANG Ji-sheng
Institution:1. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The Third Hospital of Mianyang(Sichuan Mental Health Center), Sichuan Mianyang 621000, China; 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weak opioids and low dose strong opioids in the treatment of moderate cancer pain.METHODS Electronic databases of Pubmed,EMbase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,Wan Fang and VIP were searched with the key words including morphine,oxycodone,tramadol,codeine and moderate cancer pain.Primary endpoint was clinical efficacy and the secondary endpoint were side effects (nausea/vomiting,drowsiness,anorexia and constipation).Review Manager 5.3 was used to perform the meta-analysis,GRADE quality of evidence system was used to assess the results of meta-analysis.RESULTS Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 708 patients were included.Meta-analysis results indicated that LDSO was superior in pain reliefOR=3.50,95% CI(2.39 to 5.13),P<0.000 01] compared with WO,and the two arms had no significant difference in nausea/vomitingOR=0.92,95% CI(0.59 to 1.42),P=0.69],drowsinessOR=1.23,95% CI(0.74 to 2.05),P=0.42],anorexiaOR=1.19,95% CI(0.59 to 2.37),P=0.63] or constipationOR=1.34,95% CI(0.87 to 2.07),P=0.19] between the two arms.The evidence of pain relief and side effects were moderate as assessed by GRADE quality of evidence system.CONCLUSION LDSO is superior in pain relief than WO in the treatment of moderate cancer pain and well tolerated,which indicates that LDSO is a viable treatment for patients with moderate cancer pain.
Keywords:strong opioids  weak opioids  moderate cancer pain  meta-analysis  GRADE profiler  
点击此处可从《中国医院药学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医院药学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号