首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

成人心理弹性量表(RSA)在城市孕妇人群中的信效度评价
引用本文:马雪梅,史慧静,王英,胡花,朱清扬,张蕴晖. 成人心理弹性量表(RSA)在城市孕妇人群中的信效度评价[J]. 复旦学报(医学版), 2019, 46(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2019.01.001
作者姓名:马雪梅  史慧静  王英  胡花  朱清扬  张蕴晖
作者单位:1复旦大学公共卫生学院妇幼与儿少卫生教研室,4环境卫生教研室 上海 200032; 2上海市松江区妇幼保健院妇产科 上海 201600; 3上海市浦东医院(复旦大学附属浦东医院)妇产科 上海 510070
基金项目:上海市公共卫生与预防医学Ⅰ类高峰学科建设计划;上海市第四轮公共卫生三年行动计划(15GWZK0402)
摘    要: 目的  检验成人心理弹性量表(Resilience Scale for Adults,RSA)在城市孕妇人群中的信效度。方法  以2016年6月至2017年8月期间在上海两所接产医院建大卡并愿意参加“上海亲子队列”的1 689名孕妇为研究对象,孕16周左右填写RSA,孕32~36周时填写焦虑和抑郁量表(SAS和CES-D)。在对RSA进行项目分析并探索量表结构的基础上,对修订后的量表进行信效度检验。 结果  经项目分析和探索性因子分析,修订后的RSA保留22个条目,含5个因子,因子负荷在0.428~0.768,累积方差解释率为52.493%。总量表的分半信度为0.798,总量表及各因子的内部一致性系数为0.546~0.850。各因子分与总量表分高度相关,相关系数为0.540~0.778;各因子间相关系数略低,为0.171~0.590。修订后的量表总分与孕晚期焦虑、抑郁水平呈显著负相关。验证性因子分析发现,χ2/df值为6.783,GFI、CFI、IFI、AGFI值分别为0.919、0.881、0.881、0.897,RMSEA值为0.059。结论  修订后的RSA在孕妇人群中具有良好的心理测量属性。

关 键 词:成人心理弹性量表(RSA)  孕妇  信度  效度

Reliability and validity of Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) in urban pregnant women
MA Xue-mei,SHI Hui-jing,WANG Ying,HU Hua,ZHU Qing-yang,ZHANG Yun-hui. Reliability and validity of Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) in urban pregnant women[J]. Fudan University Journal of Medical Sciences, 2019, 46(1): 1-7. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8467.2019.01.001
Authors:MA Xue-mei  SHI Hui-jing  WANG Ying  HU Hua  ZHU Qing-yang  ZHANG Yun-hui
Affiliation:1Department of Maternal,Child and Adolescent Health,4Department of Environmental Health,School of Public Health,Fudan University,Shanghai 200032,China; 2Department of Obsterics and Gynecology,Shanghai Songjiang Maternal Child Health Hospital,Shanghai 201600,China; 3Department of Obsterics and Gynecology,Shanghai Pudong Hospital (Fudan University Pudong Medical Center),Shanghai 510070,China
Abstract:Objective    To examine the reliability and validity of Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) in urban pregnant women.Methods    A total of 1 689 pregnant women who built pregnant women manual in two maternity hospitals in Shanghai and who would like to participate in Shanghai Maternal-Child Pairs Cohort from Jun.,2016 to Aug.,2017 were taken as research objects.RSA was filled around 16 weeks of gestation and scales for anxiety (Self-rating Anxious Scale,SAS) and depression (Center for Epidemiological Survey,Depression Scale,CES-D) were completed at 32 to 36 weeks of gestation.Based on the item analysis and exploration of the structurre of RSA,the reliability and validity of the revised RSA were tested.Results    According to item analysis and exploratory factor analysis results,the number of items in the revised RSA was reduced to 22,including five factors which explained 52.493% of the total variance and factor loading ranged from 0.428 to 0.768.The split-half reliability for the total scale was 0.798 and the coefficient of internal consistency of total scale andfactors ranged from 0.546 to 0.850.Each factor was highly correlated with the total score,with the correlation coefficient ranged from 0.540 to 0.778.The correlation coefficient between each factor was slightly lower ranging from 0.171 to 0.590.The total score of the revised RSA was negatively correlated with the level of anxiety and depression in the late pregnancy.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df value of GFI,CFI,IFI,AGFI,and RMSEA were 6.783,0.919,0.881,0.881,0.897,and 0.059,respectively.Conclusions    The revised RSA has good psychometric properties in pregnant women.
Keywords:Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA)  pregnant women  reliability  validity
点击此处可从《复旦学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《复旦学报(医学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号