首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Identifying Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Diagnoses That Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State
Affiliation:1. Orlando Health Jewett Orthopedic Institute, Orlando, Florida;2. OrthoCarolina—Hip & Knee Center, Charlotte, North Carolina;3. OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina;4. Atrium Health—Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina;1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana;2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;1. Universidad Icesi, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Cali, Colombia;2. Fundación Valle del Lili, Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas, Cali, Colombia;3. Fundación Valle del Lili, Departamento de Ortopedia y Traumatología, Cali, Colombia;1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia;2. Johns Hopkins Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia, Maryland;3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Penn Orthopaedics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;4. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri;5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
Abstract:BackgroundMinimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines a meaningful clinical change in patient-reported outcome measures. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) provides a patient-reported outcome measures threshold value to indicate a satisfactory clinical state. MCID and PASS for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) are ill-defined. Moreover, it is unknown whether diagnosis influences the likelihood of achieving MCID or PASS. The purpose of this study was to calculate MCID for aseptic rTKA and compare the percentage of patients achieving MCID and PASS per diagnosis.MethodsAn institutional registry of rTKA was used. First-time aseptic rTKA were included. Demographics, revision diagnosis, preoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Jr (KOOS Jr), and 1-year postoperative KOOS Jr were recorded. The 1-year postoperative KOOS Jr PASS score was available. MCID was calculated using distribution-based methods. Three hundred fifty eight first-time aseptic rTKAs were analyzed. The 3 most common diagnoses were aseptic loosening (n = 156), instability (n = 109), and stiffness (n = 37).ResultsThe mean KOOS Jr 1-year postoperative MCID for rTKA was 10.3. Overall, 75.4% achieved MCID and 56.9% achieved PASS. The percentage of patients per diagnosis achieving MCID and PASS, respectively, were periprosthetic fracture (100, 44), aseptic loosening (94, 60), implant fracture (88, 63), stiffness (60, 38), instability (59, 61), polyethylene wear/osteolysis (57, 57), and metal allergy (44, 33).ConclusionAseptic rTKA MCID is 10.3 for KOOS Jr at 1 year postoperatively. rTKA outcomes vary depending on preoperative diagnosis. Even in diagnoses with a high proportion of MCID achieved, less than 2/3 of patients achieved PASS, suggesting rTKA provides noticeable improvement but may not return patients to a satisfactory state.
Keywords:revision total knee arthroplasty  outcomes  minimal clinically important difference  patient acceptable symptom state  revision joint replacement
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号