Short-Term Surface Damage Mechanisms of Retrieved Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Patellar Components

BackgroundPrevious retrieval studies of patellar components for total knee arthroplasty focused on historical designs and polyethylene materials that are no longer clinically relevant. Therefore, this study aimed to compare revision reasons and surface damage mechanisms of conventional, gamma inert sterilized polyethylene and highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) patellar components in contemporary designs from a single manufacturer.MethodsA total of 114 gamma inert and 76 HXLPE patellar components were gathered in a multicenter orthopaedic implant retrieval program. Patient age and body mass index were similar between cohorts (P = .27 and P = .42, respectively); however, the gamma inert cohort was implanted longer (μ_difference = 3.1 years; P = .005). A matched subset was created based on the total knee arthroplasty design, patellar shape, and implantation time. Revision reasons were gathered from revision operating notes, and surface damage was examined via the Hood scoring method. Differences between HXLPE and gamma inert cohorts were evaluated using Mann-Whitney U-tests.ResultsThe most common revision reasons were infection, loosening, and instability, with the most common patellar complication resulting in revision being patellar loosening for both cohorts with similar incidences for both (chi-square; P = .60, P = .59). The most common surface damage modes were burnishing, scratching, and pitting in both cohorts. Total surface damage was significantly higher in the gamma inert components (P = .02), but not in the matched subset (P = .46).ConclusionOverall, the clinical performance of HXLPE was similar to that of conventional polyethylene for patellar components with short implantation times. While this study provides much needed information on the performance of HXLPE patellae in short-term retrievals, long-term studies are still needed.