首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

功能性发声障碍患者嗓音及心理状态评估分析
引用本文:张凯婷,刘杰,许贞菊,张晓雪,曹松丽,韩敏. 功能性发声障碍患者嗓音及心理状态评估分析[J]. 山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报, 2021, 35(3): 37-41. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.114
作者姓名:张凯婷  刘杰  许贞菊  张晓雪  曹松丽  韩敏
作者单位:青岛大学附属医院 耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,山东 青岛266071;青岛大学附属医院 手术室,山东 青岛266071
摘    要:目的 通过对功能性发声障碍患者进行嗓音和心理状态评估,探讨其在功能性发声障碍诊疗中的临床意义.方法 选取72例功能性发声障碍患者(实验组)和无嗓音障碍的正常人(对照组)40例.其中功能性发声障碍组中功能增强型发声障碍50例,功能减弱型发声障碍22例.所有患者均进行计算机嗓音评估、GRBAS评估、嗓音障碍指数量表(VHI...

关 键 词:功能性发声障碍  嗓音评估  抑郁自评量表  焦虑自评量表  GRBAS评估

Evaluation of voice and mental state in patients with functional dysphonia
ZHANG Kaiting,LIU Jie,XU Zhenju,ZHANG Xiaoxue,CAO Songli,HAN Min. Evaluation of voice and mental state in patients with functional dysphonia[J]. Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University, 2021, 35(3): 37-41. DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1673-3770.1.2020.114
Authors:ZHANG Kaiting  LIU Jie  XU Zhenju  ZHANG Xiaoxue  CAO Songli  HAN Min
Affiliation:1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China;2. Operating Room, the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong, China
Abstract:Objective We aimed to explore the clinical importance of voice and mental state assessment in the diagnosis and treatment of functional speech disorders. Methods We selected 72 patients with functional dysphonia(experimental group)and 40 individuals without dysphonia(control group)from the Department of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, from August 2017 to October 2020. In the functional dysphonia group, 50 individuals had enhanced dysphonia and 22 had diminished dysphonia. All patients underwent voice assessment, evaluation using the Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain(GRBAS)scale and voice handicap index(VHI)scale, dynamic laryngoscopy, and evaluation of anxiety(Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SAS)and depression(Self-Rating Depression Scale, SDS). We compared evaluation results of the various indicators between the two groups. Results In the experimental group, the GRBAS score was 1.92±1.03 and the VHI score was 58.43±23.17. Vocal cord closure, mucosal wave, symmetry, and periodicity scores in the experimental group were significantly different from those of the control group, in stroboscopic examination. In computer voice evaluation, the frequency perturbation, amplitude perturbation, and maximum sound time in the experimental group were significantly different from these values of the control group. We found significant differences in SAS and SDS scores between the experimental and control groups. Conclusion Voice and mental state assessment are important for guiding the diagnosis and treatment of patients with functional phonation disorder.
Keywords:Functional dysphonia  Voice assessment  Self-rating anxiety scale  Self-rating depression scale  GRBAS evaluation  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号