DHS、PFNA及人工关节治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折临床疗效分析

目的：探讨DHS、股骨近端防旋髓内钉（PFNA）及人工关节置换不同植入物治疗老年人股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析2005年1月~2010年1月以不同方法治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折资料完整患者126例,其中DHS 46例、PFNA 38例及人工关节置42例,比较各组手术时间、术中平均出血量、围手术期并发症及Harris髋关节功能评分等指标。结果：本组126例病人出院后均得到随访,随访时间为6~60个月,平均18个月。内固定组均获得骨性愈合。手术时间PFNA组较其他2组短,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。术中出血量和围手术期并发症上,PFNA组较其他2组少,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。改良Harris髋关节功能评分上,PFNA及人工关节组较DHS组为优,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：DHS及PFNA固定与人工关节置换治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折,均可获得满意的临床疗效。相对于DHS和人工关节置换,PFNA治疗股骨粗隆间骨折具有操作简单,出血少,手术时间短,固定可靠,尤其适用于老年患者的股骨粗隆间骨折。

The Clinical Effect of DHS,PFNA and Artificial Joints Replacement for Treatment of Senile Patients with Intertrochanteric Fractures

Objective:To detect the curative effect of dynamic hip screw(DHS),proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA),and artificial joint replacement for treatment of senile patients with intertrochanteric fractures.Methods:Retrospective analysis of 126 cases of senile intertrochanteric fractures from January 2005 to January 2010,who were treated with DHS(46 cases),PFNA(38 cases),and artificial joint replacement(42 cases).The operation time,mean intraoperative blood loss,postoperative complications,and the Harris hi...