首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Techniques for teaching electrocardiogram interpretation: self-directed learning is less effective than a workshop or lecture
Authors:Mahler Simon A  Wolcott Christopher J  Swoboda Thomas K  Wang Hao  Arnold Thomas C
Institution:Department of Emergency Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA. smahler@wfubmc.edu
Abstract:Medical Education 2011: 45 : 347–353 Context Teaching 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation to students and residents is a challenge for medical educators. To date, few studies have compared the effectiveness of different techniques used for ECG teaching. Objectives This study aimed to determine if common teaching techniques, such as those involving workshops, lectures and self‐directed learning (SDL), increase medical students’ ability to correctly interpret ECGs. It also aimed to compare the effectiveness of these formats. Methods This was a prospective randomised study conducted over a 28‐month period. Year 4 medical students were randomised to receive teaching in ECG interpretation using one of three teaching formats: workshop, lecture or SDL. All three formats covered the same content. Students were administered three tests: a pre‐test (before teaching); a post‐test (immediately after teaching), and a retention test (1 week after teaching). Each tested the same content using 25 questions worth 1 point each. A mixed‐model repeated‐measures analysis of variance (anova ) with least squares post hoc analysis was conducted to determine if differences in test scores between the formats were statistically significant. Results Of the 223 students for whom data were analysed, 79 were randomised to a workshop, 82 to a lecture‐based format and 62 to SDL. All three teaching formats resulted in a statistically significant improvement in individual test scores (p < 0.001). Comparison of the lecture‐ and workshop‐based formats demonstrated no difference in test scores (marginal mean MM] for both formats = 12.4, 95% confidence interval 95% CI] 11.7–13.2]; p = 0.99). Test scores of students using SDL (MM = 10.7, 95% CI 9.8–11.5) were lower than those of students in the workshop (p = 0.003) and lecture (p = 0.002) groups. Conclusions Compared with those taught using workshop‐ and lecture‐based formats, medical students learning ECG interpretation by SDL had lower test scores.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号