首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: Auditory evoked fields
Authors:John E Moran  Norman Tepley  Gary P Jacobson  Gregory L Barkley MD
Institution:(1) Physics Department, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, USA;(2) Department of Neurology, K-11, Henry Ford Hospital and Health Sciences Center, 2799 W. Grand Blvd., 48202-2689 Detroit, MI, USA;(3) Division of Audiology, Henry Ford Hospital and Health Sciences Center, Detroit, MI, USA
Abstract:Summary Electric potential maps and magnetic field maps have been used to study brain electrical activity. During the temporal course of an evoked cortical response, the electrical activity of specific neuronal subpopulations change in a sequential manner giving rise to measurable electrical potentials and magnetic fields. For these potentials and fields, both the amplitude and rate of amplitude change have characteristic, time-dependent waveforms. Presently, amplitude waveforms from multiple locations are used to generate magnetic field and electric potential maps which have been found to be useful in understanding the activity of the neurons which give rise to these maps (Romani 1990). This paper introduces a data transformation technique which results in a derived map that we have termed a "finite difference field map" (FDFM). This mapping technique provides information associated with the rate at which the amplitude of the neuronal electric activity changes. In this paper, some advantages of FDFM analysis are illustrated by application of this technique to the study of the auditory evoked cortical field (AECF) N1m waveform. Using data obtained from normal subjects it will be demonstrated that application of the FDFM technique allows the localization of the primary N1m source at an earlier latency than is possible using the conventional waveform data. The source location determined at an early latency by FDFM analysis was identical to that obtained at later latency from the conventional field data. These data suggest that the primary N1m source is stationary. In addition, analysis of the time sequence of FDFM field maps contains evidence of a second spatially separate source which is co-active with primary N1m source.
Keywords:Magnetoencephalography  Neuromagnetism  Auditory evoked response  Brain mapping
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号