首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

四种方法治疗鼻腔非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效比较
引用本文:韩宝林,庞青松,庞得全,王平.四种方法治疗鼻腔非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效比较[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2006,18(3):177-178,183.
作者姓名:韩宝林  庞青松  庞得全  王平
作者单位:1. 天津医科大学附属肿瘤医院放疗科
2. 华北煤炭医学院放疗科
摘    要: 目的 评价化疗、放疗、放疗加化疗及自体外周血干细胞移植(APBSCT)联合全身照射(TBI)4种治疗方法对原发鼻腔的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(N-NHL)的疗效。方法 1980年至2000年间我院收治的原发鼻腔非霍奇金淋巴瘤(N-NHL)138例进行回顾分析。放射治疗:主野鼻前"凸"字野,辅单或双侧耳前野,累及口咽者先用面颈联合野。鼻腔靶区中位剂量56.0(35.2~75.5)Gy。化疗:放射治疗前、中、后或单纯化疗,方案为COP,COPP,COMP,CHOP,COBDP。6例为APBST联合 TBI 。TBI组剂量为6MV X 线8 Gy,有两例原发灶加量30 Gy。结果 单化组、单放组、放疗加化疗组及APBST联合 TBI组局部控制率分别为12 %,69 %,76 %,83 %;5年总生存率分别为9 %,52 %,63 %,83 %。APBSCT联合TBI组生存率优于放疗加化疗组,而放疗加化疗组优于单放组,单放组优于单化组(P<0.05)。结论 放化疗结合的治疗应成为N-NHL的主要治疗方法,而APBSCT联合TBI取得了更好的疗效。

关 键 词:化疗  放疗  放疗加化疗  自体外周血干细胞移植  联合全身照射  鼻腔非霍奇金淋巴瘤
文章编号:1006-9801(2006)03-0177-03
收稿时间:2005-05-16
修稿时间:2005-05-162005-07-28

Compare the curative effect of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma by four types of therapy
HAN Baa-lin,PANG Qing-song,PANG De-quan,WANG Ping.Compare the curative effect of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma by four types of therapy[J].Cancer Research and Clinic,2006,18(3):177-178,183.
Authors:HAN Baa-lin  PANG Qing-song  PANG De-quan  WANG Ping
Institution:Department of Radiation Oncology, Baodi Hospital
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the curative effect of nasal non-Hodgkin lymphoma(N-NHL) by four types of therapy such as pure chemotherapy, pure radiotherapy, chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy, and APBSCT combined with TBI. Methods One hundred and thirty five patients with nasal NHL were treated between 1980 and 2000. All patients received radiotherapy alone or chemotherapy alone or radiotherapy combined with radiotherapy or TBI combined with APBSCT. The median radiation dose to the nasal cavity was 56.0 Gy with a range of 35.2 to 75.5 Gy. Six patients received TBI combined APBSCT. The TBI dose was 8 Gy. Two patients received 30 Gy in nasal of the six patients. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of 2-6 cycles of COP, COPP, COMP, CHOP, COBDP. Results The local control rate and 5-year survival rate of the four groups of pure chemotherapy, pure radiotherapy, combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy and APBSCT combined with TBI were 12 %, 69 %, 76 %, 83 % and 9 %, 52 %, 63 %, 83 %. For the four groups, the best is APBSCT, then combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy group ,then pure radiotherapy, the last is pure chemotherapy. There is significant difference between the four groups(P <0.05). Conclusion Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy become the most important methods to N-NHL, but APBSCT combined TBI achieved better effect.
Keywords:Non-Hodgekin's lymphoma  Pure chemotherapy  Pure radiotherapy  Combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy  APBSCT combined with TBI
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《肿瘤研究与临床》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《肿瘤研究与临床》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号