急性冠脉综合征介入治疗与药物治疗的对比研究

目的探讨经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术(PCI)对急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的临床疗效极其干预时机。方法对76例ACS患者在药物治疗的基础上行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术(介入组),74例ACS患者行药物保守治疗(对照组),比较两组住院期间与随访的情况。结果介入组住院期间死亡1人,出院后死亡1人,平均住院天数13.6(11.3±3.2)d。随访3个月,心绞痛再发3例,再行PCI术2例,冠脉搭桥术(CABG)2例,左室射血分数(LVEF),(49.5±3.2)%,比入院时增加(5.3±1.31)%。对照组住院期间死亡3例,平均住院天数为20.4(16.2±5.5)d。随访3个月,心绞痛再发22例,择期PCI术9例,冠脉搭桥7例,LVEF为(43.8±6.2)%,较入院时无明显变化。结论对ACS患者行PCI术可使缺血心肌得以血运重建,明显降低ACS患者心绞痛发生率,缩短住院天数,改善左室功能及生活质量。

Comparepercutaneous Coronary Intervention and Drug Treatments of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Objective To compare the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and drug treatments of acute coronary syndrome. Methods 76 patients were selected as PCI treament group while 74 patients were selected as drug treatment group. The qualities of life of the two groups were investigated during hospitalization. Three month after discharged from hospital, their qualities of life were investigated again. Result The quality of the PCI treatment group was significantly better than the drug treatment group, especially improvement in sociological function and physical function. Conclusion PCI treatment has positive effects on the quality of life of patients with acute coronary syndrome.