不同干预方法缓解新生儿疼痛的效果比较

目的对比不同干预方法缓解新生儿疼痛的效果,探索非药物治疗缓解新生儿疼痛的有效方法。方法将160例住院新生儿随机分为对照组（未干预组）、非营养性吸吮（non-nutritive sucking,NNS）组、体位支持组、拥抱抚触组各40例,在采足跟血疼痛刺激前、刺激后20s、1min、2min、3min分别记录心率、呼吸、经皮氧饱和度和哭声持续时间。结果穿刺后20s各组心率、呼吸均快于穿刺前,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,1min时拥抱抚触组的心率、呼吸频率恢复到穿刺前水平,2min时NNS组、体位支持组的心率、呼吸频率也恢复到穿刺前水平,而对照组仍快于穿刺前（P〈0.05）,各组经皮氧饱和度穿刺前后均差异均无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,穿刺后哭声持续时间NNS组、体位支持组和拥抱抚触组均少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）,且拥抱抚触组哭声持续时间明显少于NNS组和体位支持组（P〈0.05）。结论新生儿对急性疼痛很敏感,非营养性吸吮、体位支持和拥抱抚触对新生儿均有明显止痛作用,在临床护理中,可应用非药物性干预措施如非营养性吸吮（NNS）、体位支持、拥抱抚触等以减轻新生儿操作性疼痛。

A RESEARCH ABOUT CLINICAL EFFECTS OF USING DIFFERENT INTERVENTION METHODS TO AMELIORATE THE PAINS OF NEONATAL INFANTS

Objectives To compare the analgesia effects of using different intervention method among neonatal infants,and then find out the most effective method.Methods 160 neonatal infants were randomly divided into four groups,included control group,NNS group,position group and touching group,there were 40 cases in each group.Blood sampling were collected at heel,the rate of cardiac activity,respiration,transcutaneous blood-oxygen saturation and crying time were recorded before stimulation and after stimulation at t...