Association between Cyclin D1 polymorphism and oral cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

Data from several case–control studies on the relation between the Cyclin D1 (CCND1) G870A polymorphism and oral cancer susceptibility implicated conflicting conclusions. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to derive a more precise evaluation of the association. We searched PubMed and Embase for related studies that had been published in English and eight available studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. Odd ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each study. Our meta-analysis suggested that CCND1 G870A polymorphism was not associated with oral cancer risk (OR _{AA vs. GG}?=?1.08, 95 % CI?=?0.90–1.30, P _{heterogeneity}?=?0.175; OR _{AA + GA vs. GG}?=?1.02, 95 % CI?=?0.91–1.14, P _{heterogeneity}?=?0.781; OR _{AA vs. GA + GG}?=?1.16, 95 % CI?=?0.98–1.36, P _{heterogeneity}?=?0.107; OR _{A vs. G}?=?1.05 95 % CI?=?0.96–1.15, P _{heterogeneity}?=?0.211; OR _{GA vs. GG}?=?0.94, 95 % CI?=?0.82–1.08, P _{heterogeneity}?=?0.935). However, in the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, possible significance among Asian groups was indicated in two genetic models (OR _{AA vs. GA + GG}?=?1.27, 95 % CI?=?1.05–1.54, P _{heterogeneity}?=?0.572; OR _{allele A vs. allele G}?=?1.11, 95 % CI?=?1.00–1.24, P _{heterogeneity}?=?0.211). Taken together, the meta-analysis revealed that CCND1 G870A polymorphism might be correlated with the susceptibility of oral cancer in Asians.