Evaluation of the Trifecta obturating technique

Abstract – The aim of this project was to evaluate and compare the radiographic quality and sealability of root fillings in extracted human teeth using lateral condensation of gutta‐percha or the Trifecta obturating system. One hundred freshly extracted human mature, single‐rooted teeth were divided into four identical groups of 25 teeth on the basis of root canal shape. The root canals of two groups were prepared in such a way as to produce a relatively parallel canal shape with little or no flare towards the coronal orifice. The root canals of the other two groups were prepared in such a way as to produce a canal shape that was deliberately more flared to ensure that they were wider at the orifice than at the endpoint of the preparation. All root canals were flushed with 17% EDTA solution and 2.5% NaOCl to remove the dentinal smear layer. The canals of one flared and one parallel group were obturated using cold lateral condensation and the canals of the other two groups were obturated using the Trifecta system. The sealability of each technique was assessed by a dye penetration method. The radiographic quality of obturation was determined for each canal using a 4‐point scale. Canals filled with thermoplasticised gutta‐percha had significantly less apical dye penetration than those obturated by lateral condensation (P<0.001). Lateral condensation achieved significantly better scores for radiographic quality than thermoplasticised gutta‐percha from both the bucco‐lingual (P<0.001) and the mesio‐distal views (P<0.001). Root canals obturated using the Trifecta technique showed significantly more apical extrusion of sealer than those obturated by lateral condensation (P<0.001). Under laboratory conditions the Trifecta technique had better sealability but poorer radiographic quality than lateral condensation.