首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

“见习-问题-讨论”模式对学生评判性思维能力的影响研究
引用本文:唐文凤. “见习-问题-讨论”模式对学生评判性思维能力的影响研究[J]. 医学教育探索, 2010, 9(11): 1480-1482
作者姓名:唐文凤
作者单位:重庆医科大学附属第一医院胸心外科,400016
摘    要:目的探讨评判性思维教学模式、方法、效果。方法选取重庆医科大学护理系本科160名,随机分为实验组和对照组。对照组采用传统教学法,实验组采用"见习-问题-讨论"教学模式,应用学期考试成绩和评判性思维能力测量表对教学效果进行评价。结果按"见习-问题-讨论"模式进行胸心外科教学,课程成绩实验组分数高于对照组(P〈0.01);在开放思想等7方面实验组得分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论应用"见习-问题-讨论"教学模式有利于护理学生进行评判性思维训练。

关 键 词:评判性思维  教学方法  护理教育研究

Influence of 'probation noviciating-questioning-disussing' teaching model on improving critical thinking
TANG Wen-feng. Influence of 'probation noviciating-questioning-disussing' teaching model on improving critical thinking[J]. Researches in Medical Education, 2010, 9(11): 1480-1482
Authors:TANG Wen-feng
Affiliation:TANG Wen-feng.Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery,the First Affiliated Hospital,Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400016,China
Abstract:Obiject Toexplore teachingmode,methods andeffects basedoncritical thinking.Methods Students in grade 2004,grade 2005 nursing department of Chongqing medical university were chosen as the subjet.The students were devied into experimetal group(80 students) and contrast group(80 students) randomly.Traditional teaching method were used in the contrast group while the experimental group recieved "probation noviciating-questioning-disussing "teaching mode.Results The scores of the "probation noviciating-questioning-discussing"group in cardio-thoracic surgury were significately higher than the contrast group(P0.01);the score were higher in the experimental group than the contrast group in the 7 aspects such as open minded ness,analysis ability,critical thinking,confidence,learning desire and maturity,(P0.05).Conclusion The"probation noviciating-questioning-discussing"teaching mode is useful in treating critical thinking of sutudents in nursing department.
Keywords:Critical thinking  TeachingMethods  Nursingeducationresearch
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号