A randomized controlled trial of early oral feeding in laryngectomized patients

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of early oral feeding by comparing it with feeding through primary tracheoesophageal puncture after total laryngectomy with primary pharyngeal closure. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. METHODS: Patients who underwent total laryngectomy with primary pharyngeal closure and who were candidates for primary voice restoration (an in whose cases primary tracheoesophageal puncture [TEP] was created) were included. After total laryngectomy, patients were randomly assigned to either the oral group (study group) or the TEP group (control group). Patients in the oral group were fed orally with a clear liquid diet on the first postoperative day, then advanced to a regular diet, whereas patients in the TEP group were fed through tracheoesophageal puncture and received nothing orally until the seventh postoperative day; then they were fed orally if fistula had not occurred. Standard criteria for discharge were used for all the patients. RESULTS: During a 3-year period, 67 patients were enrolled in the trial, and complete data were available for 65 patients (32 patients in the oral group, 33 patients in the TEP group). The two groups were similar for factors reported to influence the rate of pharyngocutaneous fistula. In three (9%) patients in the TEP group, fistula occurred on the 5th, 7th, and 14th postoperative days, respectively. Two (6.2%) fistulas occurred in the oral group on the sixth and eighth postoperative days, respectively. In patients without fistula, the mean length of hospital stay was 7.6 days (range, 4-19 d [SD = 3.1 d]) for the oral group and 8.2 days (range, 7-18 d [SD = 2.6 d) for the TEP group. There was no significant difference between two groups for either the incidence of fistula or the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of oral feeding on the first postoperative day in patients undergoing total laryngectomy with primary pharyngeal closure is a safe clinical practice. However, it does not shorten the length of hospital stay for these patients.