首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

干扰素与拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎的成本-效果分析
引用本文:陈安进,张芳,徐艳. 干扰素与拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎的成本-效果分析[J]. 中国药房, 2007, 18(26): 2010-2011
作者姓名:陈安进  张芳  徐艳
作者单位:青岛市市立医院,青岛市,266011
摘    要:目的:评价干扰素与拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎的经济学效果。方法:对2种治疗方案进行成本-效果分析,并运用Bootstrap法进行敏感度分析。结果:干扰素组、拉米夫定组的成本-效果比分别为9 128.31、11 491.70;以成本较低的干扰素组为基本组,拉米夫定组的增量成本-效果比为45 727.01;Bootstrap分析得拉米夫定组的增量成本平均中值为46 236.24。结论:干扰素治疗方案虽有效率较低,但从药物经济学角度分析,为治疗慢性乙型肝炎的较佳方案。

关 键 词:干扰素  拉米夫定  慢性乙型肝炎  成本-效果分析  Bootstrap分析
文章编号:1001-0408(2007)26-2010-02
收稿时间:2007-01-22
修稿时间:2007-05-21

Interferon vs.Lamivudine for Chronic Type B Hepatitis: Analysis of Cost- Effectiveness
CHEN Anjin,ZHANG Fang,XU Yan. Interferon vs.Lamivudine for Chronic Type B Hepatitis: Analysis of Cost- Effectiveness[J]. China Pharmacy, 2007, 18(26): 2010-2011
Authors:CHEN Anjin  ZHANG Fang  XU Yan
Affiliation:Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of interferon vs.lamivudine for chronic Type B hepatitis.METHODS: The cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out to evaluate two therapeutic schemes for chronic Type B hepatitis,and Bootstrap analysis was performed for sensitivity analysis.RESULTS: The cost-effectiveness ratios of interferon and lamivudine were 9 128.31 and 11 491.70,respectively.As compared with low cost interferon group,the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in lamivudine group was 45 727.01.The median of incremental cost in lamivudine group obtained from Bootstrap analysis was 46 236.24.CONCLUSION: Pharmacoeconomically,interferon scheme is optimal for chronic Type B hepatitis in spite of its lower effectiveness rate as compared with lamivudine scheme.
Keywords:Interferon  Lamivudine  Chronic type B hepatitis  Cost-effectiveness analysis  Bootstrap analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号