首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

肺内孤立灶大体肿瘤体积CT不同扫描方式比较
引用本文:尚东平,王玮,李建彬,王云刚,张英杰,李延持,杜君.肺内孤立灶大体肿瘤体积CT不同扫描方式比较[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2012,21(5):436-438.
作者姓名:尚东平  王玮  李建彬  王云刚  张英杰  李延持  杜君
作者单位:250117 济南,山东省放射肿瘤学重点实验室山东省肿瘤医院和研究所放疗科
基金项目:2011年山东省自然科学基金,山东省科学技术发展计划项目
摘    要:目的 比较CT不同扫描方式对肺内孤立病灶大体肿瘤体积(GTV)勾画影响,探讨螺旋扫描在CT模拟定位中的可行性。方法 对 16例周围型或转移性肺癌分别行轴位(A)、螺旋(S) CT扫描,比较GTVA、GTVs大小和位置差异(配对t检验),计算GTVA、GTVs匹配指数(MI)及与体积相关性(两变量相关分析)。结果 GTVA、GTVs大小分别为8.95、9.38 cm3(t=0.43,P=0.667)。GTVA、GTVs等中心点坐标值x轴分别为6.80、6.81 cm (t=0.27,P=0.794),y轴分别为36.19、36.05 cm (t=0.37,P=0.717),z轴分别为4.99、4.96 cm (t=0.65,P=0.526)。GTVA和GTVs等中心点至坐标原点距离相似(38.31 cm∶38.23 cm,t=0.47,P=0.646)。GTVA与GTVs的MI为0.36(0~0.77),MI与体积显著相关(r=0.587,P=0.017)。结论 轴位与螺旋CT扫描方式确定肺内孤立灶GTV的MI与其有相关性,螺旋扫描速度更快,在肺内孤立灶CT模拟定位中具有可行性。

关 键 词:体层摄影术  X线计算机  肺肿瘤  孤立灶  大体肿瘤体积  
收稿时间:2012-01-10

A comparison of the different CT scanning modes on the GTV delineation of the solitary pulmonary lesion
SHANG Dong-ping,WANG Wei,LI Jian-bin,WANG Yun-gang,ZHANG Ying-jie,LI Yan-chi,DU Jun.A comparison of the different CT scanning modes on the GTV delineation of the solitary pulmonary lesion[J].Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology,2012,21(5):436-438.
Authors:SHANG Dong-ping  WANG Wei  LI Jian-bin  WANG Yun-gang  ZHANG Ying-jie  LI Yan-chi  DU Jun
Institution:Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Tumor Hospital and Institute;Shandong Province Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology;Ji′nan 250117,ChinaCorresponding author:LI Jian-bin, Email:lijianbin@msn.com
Abstract:Objective To explore the influence of the CT scanning mode on the gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation of solitary pulmonary lesion (SPL), and to evaluate the feasibility of the spiral CT scan in CT simulation. Methods Sixteen patients with SPL underwent axial scan, spiral scan during free breathing. Compare the target position, volume between GTVs and GTVA (paired t-test). The matching index (MI) between GTVs and GTVA and correlations between MI and the tumor volume were calculated (bivariate correlation analysis). Results GTVs and GTVA volume was 8.95 cm3 and 9.38 cm3(t=0.43,P=0.667), respectively. The centroid position for GTVs and GTVA in x,y and z axises were 6.80 cm and 6.81 cm (t=0.27,P=0.794), 36.19 cm and 36.05 cm (t=0.37,P=0.717), and 4.99 cm and 4.96 cm (t=0.65,P=0.526),respectively. There were also no statistically significant difference in the distance between the centroidal position and origin of coordinates for GTVs and GTVA (38.31 cm∶38.23 cm,t=0.47,P=0.646). MI between GTVs and GTVA was 0.36(range 0-0.77), correlated with the tumor volume (r=0.587, P=0.017). Conclusions There was no significant difference between the axial scan and spiral scan in the GTV volume and position for SPL, but MI between GTVs and GTVA were small. A correlation was found for the MI between GTVs and GTVA with the tumor volume. Spiral CT scan was more timesaving, and was feasible in CT simulation scan.
Keywords:Tomography  X-ray computed  Lung neoplasms  solitary lesion  Gross tumor volume
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号