Co-stimulation via CD28 induces activation of a refractory subset of MRL-Ipr/Ipr T lymphocytes |
| |
Authors: | Clements, James L. Winslow, Genine Donahue, Christopher Cooper, Sheldon M. Allison, James P. Budd, Ralph C. |
| |
Affiliation: | Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology Unit, The University of Vermont College of Medicine Burlington, VT 05405, USA 1 Cancer Research Laboratory, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Peripheral lymphoid tissues of Ipr mice contain a large proportionof TCRß/CD3+CD4–CD8– T cells that lacksurface CD2 and express the B cell isoform of CD45, B220. Thissubset of T cells does not proliferate or produce IL-2 in responseto mitogenic signals or TCR–CD3 ligation. At the sametime, these abnormal T cells display several characteristicsof an activated phenotype. Collectively, these properties ofIpr CD4–CD8– T cells have functional parallels withanergic T cells. A critical co-stimulatory molecule implicatedin the prevention of or recovery from anergy is CD28, whichbinds the ligand BB1/B7 on certain accessory cells. Ipr CD4–CD8–T cells express normal levels of CD28 which is capable of transducinga strong proliferative signal to these cells in co-stimulationwith mitogens. However, proliferation of Ipr CD4–CD8–T cells in response to CD28 co-stimulation does not reach thelevels observed in normal T cells stimulated under similar conditions.Stimulation with anti-CD28 mAb in conjunction with phorbol myristateacetate and lonomycin promotes cell cycling in the CD2–subset of CD4–CD8– T cells, and results in a slightinduction of CD2 levels during the course of the culture period.However, the majority of cells obtained at the end of the cultureperiod remain TCRß+ CD4–CD8–, CD2low/–and B220high, similar to freshly isolated CD4–CD8–Ipr T cells. In contrast, if IL-2 is included in the cultures,a strong shift toward a CD2+ phenotype is observed by a majorityof the Ipr T cells. Upon repeat stimulation, these Ipr CD4–CD8–T cells can now proliferate in an IL-2-dependent manner whenstimulated with only anti-CD3 mAb or mitogens, in the absenceof exogenous IL-2 or anti-CD28 mAb. These data show that thehyporesponsiveness of Ipr CD4–CD8– T cells doesnot result from a lack of CD28 expression, that it is not afixed state, and that it can be reversed by the induction ofcell cycling in the presence of IL-2. These observations extendthe parallels between Ipr CD4–CD8– T cells and anergicT cells. |
| |
Keywords: | CD2 IL-2 T cell anergy T cell activation |
本文献已被 Oxford 等数据库收录! |
|