首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

制霉菌素和氟康唑治疗念珠菌性口炎的临床对比观察
引用本文:庄庆,许志萍,黄磊. 制霉菌素和氟康唑治疗念珠菌性口炎的临床对比观察[J]. 北京口腔医学, 2008, 16(5)
作者姓名:庄庆  许志萍  黄磊
作者单位:广州广州市第一人民医院·广州医学院附属市一医院口腔科,510180;广州广州市第一人民医院·广州医学院附属市一医院口腔科,510180;广州广州市第一人民医院·广州医学院附属市一医院口腔科,510180
基金项目:广东省广州市医药卫生科技基金
摘    要:目的 临床对比观察制霉菌素和氟康唑对念珠菌性口炎的实际疗效.方法 对我科2004~2007年以来的108例念珠菌性口炎的患者进行治疗并跟踪观察.实验组用氟康唑进行治疗,对照组用制霉菌素治疗.结果 近期疗效:实验组显效率94.23%,对照组83.92%,两组对比无显著性差异.远期疗效:实验组治愈率90.38%,对照组41.67%.观察结果分析表明:氟康唑和制霉菌素对念珠菌性口炎在短期内均有较好的治疗作用.氟康唑的长期疗效明显好于制霉菌素(P<0.05),但仍有一定的复发率.结论 治疗口腔念珠菌病时如单纯使用制霉菌素和氟康唑在近期都有一定效果,但氟康唑的远期疗效更佳.

关 键 词:念珠菌性口炎  氟康唑  制霉菌素

Comparison between mycostain and fluconazole in the treatment of candidal stomatitis
ZHUANG Qing,XU Zhi-ping,HUANG Lei. Comparison between mycostain and fluconazole in the treatment of candidal stomatitis[J]. Beijing Journal Of Stomatology, 2008, 16(5)
Authors:ZHUANG Qing  XU Zhi-ping  HUANG Lei
Abstract:Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of mycostain and fluconazole for the treatment of candidal stomatitis.Methods A total of 108 cases with candidal stomatitis were divided into two groups and treated with fluconazole and mycostain respectively.The clinical results were compared between the two groups. Results Short term clinical effectiveness rate was 94.23% in fluconazole group and 83.92% in mycostain group. Long term clinical effectiveness rate was 90.38% in fluconazole group and 41.67% i...
Keywords:Candidal stomatitis  Fluconazole  Mycostatin  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号