Pressure-flow relationships of the canine iliac periphery and systemic hemodynamics: Effects of sodiumnitroprusside and adenosine

It has been reported that sodiumnitroprusside (SNP) decreases mean systemic pressure and simultaneously increases pressure pulse amplification towards the iliac periphery (Kenner and van Zwieten 1982). This unexpected finding was suggested to be due to a decrease in iliac peripheral resistance but an increase in iliac differential resistance. In order to investigate this apparent contradiction, the iliac periphery was hemodynamically isolated from the rest of the circulation and perfused with the dog's own blood by means of a pump. Perfusion pressure (P) and flow (F), femoral venous pressure (P_v), systemic pressure (P_s) and cardiac output (CO) were measured. Steady state pressure-flow relations of the isolated bed were obtained during control and during various i.v. infusion rates of SNP and adenosine (ADS) and were found to be straight (meanr=0.99). Their slope (P/F) was defined as differential resistance (R_d). Peripheral resistance (R_p) of the iliac bed was defined as R_p=(P-P_v)/F, calculated at the flow value where perfusion pressure equalled the prevailing systemic pressure. Total peripheral resistance (TPR) was defined as TPR=P_s/CO. The changes of R_d, R_p, P_s, CO and TPR with respect to control show that during low SNP infusion rates R_d and R_p were both increased while TPR was decreased. During all infusion rates of SNP CO did not change while P_s decreased. During low infusion rates of adenosine CO increased while P_s, R_d and R_p did not change and TPR decreased. During high infusion rates of ADS CO decreased again, R_d, R_p and P_s decreased, and TPR remained constant but at a decreased level.It is concluded that: (1) the suggestion of Kenner and van Zwieten is not supported, since SNP (as well as ADS) affects iliac peripheral and iliac differential resistance in a similar way; (2) SNP (as well as ADS) affects iliac peripheral resistance and total peripheral resistance in a differentiated way, and even in an opposite way during low infusion rates of SNP; (3) it is this opposite effect that explains the paradoxical observations of Kenner and van Zwieten; (4) for comparable reductions of TPR, CO is better maintained during infusion of SNP, while P_s is better maintained during infusion of ADS.