首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

不同树脂黏结剂对纤维桩冠向微渗漏及黏结强度的影响
作者姓名:高士军  宗婉翘  王冬霞  侯玉泽  肖媛媛  薛 钢  黄艳军  姜家真
作者单位:佳木斯大学附属第二医院修复二科,黑龙江省佳木斯市 154000
摘    要:背景:目前国内外对全酸蚀、自酸蚀及自黏结树脂黏结剂对纤维桩的冠向微渗漏及黏结强度影响的研究仍存在差异。 目的:评价全酸蚀、自酸蚀及自黏结3种树脂黏结剂对纤维桩黏固后冠向微渗漏及黏结强度影响。 方法:将32颗人离体上前牙随机分成5组,其中3组为实验组,2组为对照组。实验组离体牙经根管预备后,选用全酸蚀、自酸蚀及自黏结3种树脂黏结剂分别黏结直径为1.4 mm的玻璃纤维桩。体视显微镜下观察试件各剖面的微渗漏情况,再将实验组试件沿垂直牙长轴方向切成厚度为2 mm的薄片,万能材料测试机进行微推出实验,并观察试件断裂方式。阳性对照组不进行根管预备,根部涂布指甲油,冠部直接暴露于染色剂中;阴性对照组不进行根管预备,树脂覆盖根管口,将牙体整体涂布指甲油后黏蜡包埋至截面下1 mm。 结果与结论:各种树脂黏结剂均存在微渗漏现象,其中全酸蚀树脂黏结剂的微渗漏程度最轻,自酸蚀树脂黏结剂的微渗漏程度最重。3种树脂黏结剂间的微渗漏程度差异有显著性意义(P < 0.05)。黏结剂间的黏结强度由高到低分别为全酸蚀树脂黏结剂、自酸蚀树脂黏结剂、自黏结树脂黏结剂,3种黏结剂的黏结强度差异有显著性意义(P < 0.05)。试件的主要断裂方式为黏结剂/纤维桩间断裂及混合破坏。说明全酸蚀树脂黏结剂与牙本质结合紧密,与自酸蚀树脂黏结剂、自黏结树脂黏结剂比较在微渗漏程度及黏结性能方面显示出优越性。

关 键 词:生物材料  组织工程口腔材料  纤维桩  自酸蚀树脂黏结剂  全酸蚀树脂黏结剂  双固化树脂黏结剂  微渗漏  黏结强度  
收稿时间:2013-02-18

Effects of different resin cements on the coronal microleakage and bonding strength of fiber posts
Authors:Gao Shi-jun  Zong Wan-qiao  Wang Dong-xia  Hou Yu-ze  Xiao Yuan-yuan  Xue Gang  Huang Yan-jun  Jiang Jia-zhen
Institution:Second Department of Prosthodontics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, Jiamusi  154000, Heilongjiang Province, China
Abstract:BACKGROUND:At present, there are still differences in the studies of total-etch, self-etch and self-bonding resin cement effect on the coronal microleakage and bonding strength of fiber posts. OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the coronal microleakage and the bonding strength of fiber posts treated with three kinds of resin cements. METHODS: Totally 32 upper incisors were randomly divided into five groups, including three experimental groups and two control groups. After the root canal preparation, three kinds of resin cements (EMBRACE WetBond, LuxaCore, Medental Multi-cure) were used to fiber posts with the bond diameter of 1.4 mm. Stereomicroscope was used to observe the microleakage. Then, the specimens were cut into 2 mm wafer along the axis of tooth, and universal testing machine for push-out test was used to observe the failure mode. In the positive control group, no root canal preparation was done, the root was coated with nail polish, and the crown was directly exposed to the dye. In the negative control group, no root canal preparation was done, the root canal orifice was covered with the resin, the tooth was overall coated with nail polish and then embedded 1 mm below the section. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The microleakage was observed in all the three resin cements, Medental Multi-cure showed the least microleakage and LuxaCore showed the largest microleakage, and there was significantly different among the three kinds of resin cements (P < 0.05). The bonding strength of three cements had significant differences  (P < 0.05), and ranked from high to low: Mdental Multi-cure, LuxaCore, and EMBRACE WetBond. The main fracture modes were binder/fiber post fracture and mixed failure. The results suggest that the total-etch resin cement binds tightly with the dentin, and owns a superiority in the microleakage and bonding property as compared with the self-etch resin cements and self-bonding resin cements.
Keywords:biocompatible materials  resin cements  tooth preparation  prosthodontic  dental cements  
点击此处可从《》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号