首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

利伐沙班、达比加群与肝素在全髋或全膝置换后的抗凝治疗
引用本文:阮佳莉,吕 涛,苗菁菁,陈明义,韩忠宇,田 京. 利伐沙班、达比加群与肝素在全髋或全膝置换后的抗凝治疗[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2013, 17(13): 2390-2398. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.13.016
作者姓名:阮佳莉  吕 涛  苗菁菁  陈明义  韩忠宇  田 京
作者单位:南方医科大学珠江医院,广东省广州市 510282
摘    要:背景:目前临床上主要使用依诺肝素预防全髋或全膝置换后静脉血栓形成,但其并非百分之百的有效与安全。目的:系统评价新型口服抗凝药利伐沙班和达比加群与依诺肝素在临床随机对照试验中预防全髋或全膝置换后静脉血栓形成的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Pubed、ScienceDirect、Cochrane Library、CBM、CNKI,收集有关利伐沙班、达比加群与依诺肝素在全髋或全膝置换后抗凝治疗有效性和安全性的临床随机对照试验,并评价纳入研究的方法学质量,统计软件用RevMan5.1.0。结果与结论:共纳入14个临床随机对照试验,共17 212例患者。Meta分析显示,利伐沙班组总静脉血栓发生率、大静脉血栓及有症状静脉血栓发生率均低于依诺肝素组;利伐沙班和达比加群组深静脉血栓发生率低于依诺肝素组;利伐沙班和达比加群与依诺肝素在出血率方面差异无显著性意义。提示新型口服抗凝药对全髋或全膝置换后深静脉血栓的预防效果优于依诺肝素,且利伐沙班优于达比加群。

关 键 词:骨与关节植入物  骨与关节植入物循证医学  利伐沙班  达比加群  依诺肝素  深静脉血栓  全髋置换  全膝置换  有效性  安全性  随机对照试验  荟萃分析  
收稿时间:2012-09-10

Dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for anticoagulant therapy after total knee or hip arthroplasty
Ruan Jia-li,Lü Tao,Miao Jing-jing,Chen Ming-yi,Han Zhong-yu,Tian Jing. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for anticoagulant therapy after total knee or hip arthroplasty[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2013, 17(13): 2390-2398. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2013.13.016
Authors:Ruan Jia-li  Lü Tao  Miao Jing-jing  Chen Ming-yi  Han Zhong-yu  Tian Jing
Affiliation:Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong Province, China
Abstract:BACKGROUND:The enoxaparin is commonly used in clinic to prevent venous thrombosis after total hip or total knee replacement, but it is not 100% effective and safe.OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin in preventing venous thrombosis after total knee or hip arthroplasty in the clinical randomized controlled trials.METHODS:A computer-based online search of PubMed database, ScienceDirect database, Cochrane Library, CBM database and CNKI database was performed for the randomized controlled trials on efficacy and safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for anticoagulant therapy after total knee or hip arthroplasty. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated, and the statistical software was RevMan5.1.0.RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:A total of 14 randomized controlled trials including 17 212 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that the incidences of total vein thrombosis, large vein thrombosis and symptomatic vein thrombosis in the rivaroxaban group were lower than those in the enoxaparin group; the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in the rivaroxaban group and dabigatran group was lower than that in the enoxaparin group; there was significant difference of incidence of deep vein thrombosis between rivaroxaban group, dabigatran group and dabigatran group. It indicates that the effect of new oral anticoagulants for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis after total hip or total knee arthroplasty is superior to enoxaparin, and rivaroxaban is better than dabigatran.
Keywords:bone and joint implants  evidence-based medicine of bone and joint implants  rivaroxaban  dabigatran  enoxaparin   deep vein thrombosis  total hip arthroplasty  total knee arthroplasty  effectiveness  safety  randomized controlled trials  Meta-analysis  
点击此处可从《中国组织工程研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国组织工程研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号