首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两、三焦点牵张成骨在下颌骨缺损修复中的应用
引用本文:何志良,宫林利,王承阳,范力争,李春佳,梁振刚,张晗,梁冬青,李石岩. 两、三焦点牵张成骨在下颌骨缺损修复中的应用[J]. 临床口腔医学杂志, 2010, 26(11): 685-687
作者姓名:何志良  宫林利  王承阳  范力争  李春佳  梁振刚  张晗  梁冬青  李石岩
作者单位:1. 承德医学院第二附属医院·承德市中心医院口腔颌面外科,河北,承德,067000
2. 承德护理职业学院,河北,承德,067000
摘    要:目的:通过两焦点、三焦点对山羊下颌骨缺损进行牵张,比较两种牵张成骨方式的新骨成骨量。方法:将8只成年山羊随机分成两组,每组4只,分别采用两焦点和三焦点牵张成骨术进行骨缺损修复。牵张结束后固定8周,处死动物取牵张区新生骨组织标本进行X线检查、组织学检查、骨密度分析。结果:两实验组牵张区新骨生长的质无明显区别,在量的比较上,三焦点组X线检查、组织学检查、骨密度测定的结果均好于两焦点组,骨密度测定分析结果有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:三焦点牵张成骨在大面积颌骨缺损的修复中新骨的成骨量好于两焦点牵张成骨组。

关 键 词:牵张成骨  双焦点牵张成骨  三焦点牵张成骨  骨密度

Application of bifocal distraction osteogenesis and trifocal distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of mandibular defect
HE Zhi-liang,GONG Lin-li,WANG Cheng-yang,FAN Li-zheng,LI Chun-jia,LIANG Zhen-gang,ZHANG Han,LIANG Dong-qing,LI Shi-yan. Application of bifocal distraction osteogenesis and trifocal distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction of mandibular defect[J]. Journal of Clinical Stomatology, 2010, 26(11): 685-687
Authors:HE Zhi-liang  GONG Lin-li  WANG Cheng-yang  FAN Li-zheng  LI Chun-jia  LIANG Zhen-gang  ZHANG Han  LIANG Dong-qing  LI Shi-yan
Affiliation:HE Zhi -liang1,GONG Lin -li2,WANG Cheng -yang1,FAN Li -zheng1,LI Chun -jia1,LIANG Zhen - gang1,ZHANG Han1,LIANG Dong -qing1,LI Shi -yan1. Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery,Medical College of Chengde,Hebei. Chengde Central Hospital,Heibei Chengde 067000,China;2.Chengde Nursing Vocational School,Hebei Chengde 067000,China.
Abstract:Objective:To compare(bifocal distraction osteogenesis and trifocal distraction osteogenesis) in goat mandibular defectt,o explore the new bone mass of distraction osteogenesis in the treatment of mandibular defect.Method:8 adult goats were randomly divided into bifocal distraction group(n=4)and trifocal distraction group(n=4.) killed at the 8 weeks after completion of distraction and corresponding time in two group.Gross X-Ray,histological and bone densitometry were performed to evaluate the state of the bone healing and regeneration.Result:The newly generated bone substance no obviously difference in distraction gap,but newly generated bone quantitative trifocal distraction to compare bifocal distraction,Gross X-Ray,histological.Trifocal distraction bonedensitometry in remarkably higher than that in bifocal distraction(P 0.05).Conclusion:The technique of trifocation distraction is better than that of bifocal distraction in a large area mandibular defect.
Keywords:distraction osteogensis  bifocal distraction  trifocal distraction  bone density
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号