首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

109例视频终端用户视觉障碍的原因对比分析
引用本文:赵建军,孔怡淳.109例视频终端用户视觉障碍的原因对比分析[J].临床眼科杂志,2013(5):451-453.
作者姓名:赵建军  孔怡淳
作者单位:[1]天津市第二医院,300141 [2]天津市眼科医院,300141
摘    要:目的对比调查视频终端用户视疲劳产生原因的特点,探讨如何注意劳动保护。方法收集我院门诊就诊、有眼疲劳主观感受的患者185例,其中视频终端用户109例,其他行业工作者76例,详细询问病史和眼部检查,进行病因分析。定量资料组问比较采用t检验,定性资料组间比较采用检验,等级资料采用秩和检验。结果年龄、性别、主观症状、眼位功能、配镜情况两组差别无统计学意义,日作业时间、屈光检查、泪液分泌功能两组间差别有统计学意义。结论视频终端用户组日视作业时间高于其他行业组;屈光检查结果显示,视频终端用户组屈光不正高于其他行业组;视频终端用户组泪液分泌功能障碍更严重。

关 键 词:视频终端  视疲劳  屈光不正  干眼病

Comparative analysis of the muses of 109 cases of visual impairments in video terminal users
Institution:ZHAO Jian- jun. Tianjin No. 2 Hospital, Tianjin 300141, China ; KO NG Yi-chun. Tianjin Ophthalmological Hospital, Tiangin 300020, China
Abstract:Objective To observe and compare the causes of visual fatigue in visual display terminal ( VDT ) user versus other workers, and to discuss how to prevent VDT related visual fatigue. Methods We collected 185 patients presented with subjective feelings of visual fatigue in our hospital. Among them, 109 were VDT users. Comprehensive history and ophthalmic examination were reviewed and the causes of visual fatigue were qualitatively analyzed. Results There was no difference in age, gender, subjective symptoms, eye positions, and prescribed glasses between the two groups of patients. Howevers working time, refractions tear secretion function weresignificantly different between the two groups of patients. Conclusion Working time and refractive error were higher in VDT group. Tear secretion dysfunction was also more severe in VDT group.
Keywords:Visual display terminal  Asthenopia  Refractive error  Xerophthalmia
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号