首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

肾移植后3种免疫抑制治疗方案成本-效果分析
引用本文:宗海鹰,王丹阳,杨进益,郭军,胡志林.肾移植后3种免疫抑制治疗方案成本-效果分析[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2009(7):526-527.
作者姓名:宗海鹰  王丹阳  杨进益  郭军  胡志林
作者单位:大连市友谊医院,大连市116001
摘    要:目的:研究肾移植术后3种免疫抑制治疗方案的性价比。方法:将同期首次行肾移植患者根据免疫抑制治疗方案不同分组,即A组:国产环孢素(田可)+麦考酚吗乙酯+泼尼松;B组:进口环孢素(新山地明)+麦考酚吗乙酯+泼尼松;C组:他克莫司(FK506)+麦考酚吗乙酯+泼尼松,每组30例,分析肾移植患者开始12个月的治疗成本和效果。结果:3组术后12个月的平均成本分别为47288、57800元和62904元,显效率分别为53.33%、56.67%、80%,成本-效果比分别为886.71、1019.94和786.3。C组疗效最佳,但成本较高,A组显效率低,但较为经济。结论:肾移植术后3种免疫抑制治疗方案成本-效果比值显示,C组最佳,A组最经济,B组的性价比较差,但还要根据患者实际病情及经济条件选择。

关 键 词:肾移植  环孢素  他克莫司  成本-效果分析

Cost- effective Analysis of Three Immunosuppressive Therapies for Patients Following Renal Transplantation
ZONG Hai-ying,WANG Dan-yang,YANG Jin-yi,GUO Jun,HU Zhi-lin.Cost- effective Analysis of Three Immunosuppressive Therapies for Patients Following Renal Transplantation[J].Evaluation and Analysis of Drug-Use in Hospital of China,2009(7):526-527.
Authors:ZONG Hai-ying  WANG Dan-yang  YANG Jin-yi  GUO Jun  HU Zhi-lin
Institution:(Dalian Friendship Hospital, Dalian 116001, China)
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of three immunosuppressive therapies for patients following renal transplantation.METHODS:90 patients undergoing kidney transplantation(for the first time) simultaneously were randomly assigned into 3 groups of 30 each:Group A(domestic-made CsA + mycophenolate + prednisone),Group B imported CsA(sandimmun neoral) + mycophenolate + prednisone] and Group C(FK506 + mycophenolate + prednisone).The treatment cost and effectiveness of the three groups at 12 months after operation were analyzed.RESULTS:At 12 months,the costs of the three groups(A,B and C) Nwere 47 288,57 800 and 62 904 yuan,effectively;the remarkable effectiveness rate were 53.33%,56.67% and 80%,respectively,and the cost-effective ratios were 886.71,1 019.94 and 786.3,respectively.Group C exhibited highest curative efficacy and highest cost;Group A had lowest remarkable effectiveness rate yet it was more economical.CONCLUSION:Group C was the best one in terms of cost-effective ratio;Group A is the most economical one,while Group B had poor cost-effectiveness ratio.Finally,the choice of therapy should be based on patients' real state of illness and their economical condition.
Keywords:Renal transplantation  CsA  FK506  Cost-effective analysis
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号